2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/147637
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment
Abstract:
Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Facione, Noreen C., PhD, RN, FAAN
P.I. Institution Name:University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
Title:Professor Emerita
Co-Authors:Peter Facione, PhD
[Scientific session research presentation] Lives depend on competent clinical reasoning. Thus it is a moral imperative for health care providers to strive to monitor and improve their clinical reasoning and care related judgments. Knowing that this is the agreement owed to the public trust, agencies responsible for the accreditation of professional training programs and for the oversight of health care delivery have mandated the need to demonstrate competence in clinical reasoning in health care clinicians and students. The purpose of this paper is to outline the research on human reasoning processes as it applies to clinical reasoning, and to describe implications for improving clinical reasoning. Papers from basic science investigations on human reasoning as well as educational research on training clinical judgment will be reviewed. These will include both theoretical discussions and data based studies as the timing of the presentation permits. Examples of common clinical reasoning errors will be presented as the timing of the presentation permits. We have made this type of material easy to understand and use by clinicians around the world. Guidelines for clinicians and nurse educators will be discussed. Note that we propose to summarize information that we believe is important to nurses and nurse educators globally, but that the offering would need to be brief in a typical podium presentation.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleCritical Thinking and Clinical Judgmenten_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/147637-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Facione, Noreen C., PhD, RN, FAAN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of California San Francisco (UCSF)</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Professor Emerita</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">noreen.facione@nursing.ucsf.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Peter Facione, PhD</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Scientific session research presentation] Lives depend on competent clinical reasoning. Thus it is a moral imperative for health care providers to strive to monitor and improve their clinical reasoning and care related judgments. Knowing that this is the agreement owed to the public trust, agencies responsible for the accreditation of professional training programs and for the oversight of health care delivery have mandated the need to demonstrate competence in clinical reasoning in health care clinicians and students. The purpose of this paper is to outline the research on human reasoning processes as&nbsp;it applies to clinical reasoning, and to describe implications for improving clinical reasoning. Papers from basic science investigations on human reasoning as well as educational research on training clinical judgment will be reviewed. These will include both theoretical discussions and data based studies as the timing of the presentation permits. Examples of common clinical reasoning errors will be presented as the timing of the presentation permits. We have made this type of material easy to understand and use&nbsp;by&nbsp;clinicians around the world. Guidelines for clinicians and nurse educators will be discussed. Note that we propose to summarize information that we believe is important to nurses and nurse educators globally, but that the offering would need to be brief in a typical podium presentation.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:34:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:34:34Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.