Consensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Care of Hospitalized Diabetics and Women in Labor

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/148545
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Consensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Care of Hospitalized Diabetics and Women in Labor
Abstract:
Consensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Care of Hospitalized Diabetics and Women in Labor
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Skeahan, Loraine, RN, MA, MSN, PNP
P.I. Institution Name:Hackettstown Regional Medical Center
Title:Director of Nursing
Co-Authors:Dorothy VanDerWiele, MSN, MPA, CNAA
[Symposium scientific presentation] Participant Action Research methodology enables nurses to become the research subjects as they create a product that impacts their nursing practice. In this presentation, we will describe the findings of this action research project for two clinical groups: people who are admitted to hospital with diabetes mellitus; and women who are experiencing labor through the one hour recovery period after delivery.  Each group of nurses met every 1-2 weeks, for the labor group 6 months, for the diabetics group one year. They were paid for the 1and a half - 2 hour consensus sessions, but made individual selections of the NANDA, NIC and NOC categories on their own time. Over the 6-12 month time period, the nurses' involvement and ownership increased. They enjoyed the interplay as they spoke about patients they had experienced. They felt that making the linkages between the NIC and NOC labels was the most challenging, and at times they struggled to come to consensus. The final product for people with diabetes consisted of 14 NANDA diagnoses, 166 NIC interventions, and 124 NOC outcomes. The product for women in labor consisted of 13 NANDA diagnoses, 51 NIC interventions, and 37 NOC outcomes.   There were common themes that were evident in both groups: (1) the enormity of the project scope even with defined populations, (2) realization that their memories of NANDA categories were not accurate, (3) the need for consensus necessitated critical thinking skills, (4) the value of collaboration with each other, (5) the feelings of professional power, and (6) the connection between scholarly research and research at the bedside.   The research findings, common themes, and implications will be described.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleConsensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Care of Hospitalized Diabetics and Women in Laboren_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/148545-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Consensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Care of Hospitalized Diabetics and Women in Labor</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Skeahan, Loraine, RN, MA, MSN, PNP</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Hackettstown Regional Medical Center</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Director of Nursing</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">lskeahan@hrmcnj.org</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Dorothy VanDerWiele, MSN, MPA, CNAA</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Symposium scientific presentation] Participant Action Research methodology enables nurses to become the research subjects as they create a product that impacts their nursing practice. In this presentation, we will describe the findings of this action research project for two clinical groups: people who are admitted to hospital with diabetes mellitus; and women who are experiencing labor through the one hour recovery period after delivery.&nbsp; Each group of nurses met every 1-2 weeks, for the labor group 6 months, for the diabetics group one year. They were paid for the 1and a half - 2 hour consensus sessions, but made individual selections of the NANDA, NIC and NOC categories on their own time. Over the 6-12 month time period, the nurses' involvement and ownership increased. They enjoyed the interplay as they spoke about patients they had experienced. They felt that making the linkages between the NIC and NOC labels was the most challenging, and at times they struggled to come to consensus. The final product for people with diabetes consisted of 14 NANDA diagnoses, 166 NIC interventions, and 124 NOC outcomes. The product for women in labor consisted of 13 NANDA diagnoses, 51 NIC interventions, and 37 NOC outcomes. &nbsp; There were common themes that were evident in both groups: (1) the enormity of the project scope even with defined populations, (2) realization that their memories of NANDA categories were not accurate, (3) the need for consensus necessitated critical thinking skills, (4) the value of collaboration with each other, (5) the feelings of professional power, and (6) the connection between scholarly research and research at the bedside. &nbsp; The research findings, common themes, and implications will be described.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:46:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:46:45Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.