A Survey of Physical Examination Techniques Taught in Undergraduate Nursing Programs

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/148657
Type:
Presentation
Title:
A Survey of Physical Examination Techniques Taught in Undergraduate Nursing Programs
Abstract:
A Survey of Physical Examination Techniques Taught in Undergraduate Nursing Programs
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Giddens, Jean Foret, PhD, RN
P.I. Institution Name:University of New Mexico
Co-Authors:Linda Eddy, PhD, RN, FNP
[Scientific session research presentation] Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the physical assessment skills taught in associate and baccalaureate nursing programs. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional research study utilized non-parametric statistics. Data were collected using a Web-based survey format. Deans and directors of selected programs were contacted by e-mail with the invitation for their program to participate in the study. Participants followed a Web link to complete the survey in a secure online platform. The survey included questions about the nursing program, faculty teaching the course, and an indication of specific skills taught or not taught in the course. Sample:  The sample included 468 undergraduate (235 baccalaureate- and 233 associate-degree) nursing programs randomly selected from lists generated from the National League for Nursing and the CCNE websites. A total of 198 individuals teaching in undergraduate nursing programs completed the survey accounting for a 42% return rate. Results: Of  the 122 skills surveyed, 80% were reportedly "taught" by the majority of nursing programs, but statistically significant differences between associate and baccalaureate nursing programs existed for 71% of those skills usually taught, and all skills taught less than half the time.  When 18 systems-based assessment categories were analyzed, significant differences were found in all except assessment of integument, breast, cardiovascular, male/female reproductive, anal-rectal, sensory and central nervous systems. Conclusions: Significant differences in the physical assessment skills taught exist between baccalaureate and associate degree nursing programs. Previous research has shown that nurses use less than 25% of these same skills regularly in clinical practice regardless of their educational preparation. Considering the issues with content saturation within nursing curricula, this research raises questions about the depth physical examination content should be taught in undergraduate nursing education.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleA Survey of Physical Examination Techniques Taught in Undergraduate Nursing Programsen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/148657-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">A Survey of Physical Examination Techniques Taught in Undergraduate Nursing Programs</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Giddens, Jean Foret, PhD, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of New Mexico</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">jgiddens@salud.unm.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Linda Eddy, PhD, RN, FNP</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Scientific session research presentation] Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the physical assessment skills taught in associate and baccalaureate nursing programs. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional research study utilized non-parametric statistics. Data were collected using a Web-based survey format. Deans and directors of selected programs were contacted by e-mail with the invitation for their program to participate in the study. Participants followed a Web link to complete the survey in a secure online platform.&nbsp;The survey included questions about the nursing program, faculty teaching the course, and an indication of specific skills taught or not taught in the course. Sample:&nbsp; The sample included 468 undergraduate (235 baccalaureate- and 233 associate-degree) nursing programs randomly selected from lists generated from the National League for Nursing and the CCNE websites. A total of 198 individuals teaching in undergraduate nursing programs completed the survey accounting for a 42% return rate. Results: Of &nbsp;the 122 skills surveyed, 80% were reportedly &quot;taught&quot; by the majority of nursing programs, but statistically significant differences between associate and baccalaureate nursing programs existed for 71% of those skills usually taught, and all skills taught less than half the time. &nbsp;When 18 systems-based assessment categories were analyzed, significant differences were found in all except assessment of integument, breast, cardiovascular, male/female reproductive, anal-rectal, sensory and central nervous systems. Conclusions: Significant differences in the physical assessment skills taught exist between baccalaureate and associate degree nursing programs. Previous research has shown that nurses use less than 25% of these same skills regularly in clinical practice regardless of their educational preparation. Considering the issues with content saturation within nursing curricula, this research raises questions about the depth physical examination content should be taught in undergraduate nursing education.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:48:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:48:32Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.