Leader Empowerment, Work and Job Satisfaction and Nurse-Physician Collaboration Using Pediatric HPS

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/149003
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Leader Empowerment, Work and Job Satisfaction and Nurse-Physician Collaboration Using Pediatric HPS
Abstract:
Leader Empowerment, Work and Job Satisfaction and Nurse-Physician Collaboration Using Pediatric HPS
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2005
Author:Messmer, Patricia R., PhD, RN, BC, FAAN
P.I. Institution Name:Miami Children's Hospital
Title:Nurse Researcher
Co-Authors:Susana Barroso, RN, BSN; Jacqueline Gonzalez, ARNP, MSN, CNAA, BC
Leader empowerment (LE), organization work satisfaction (OWS), nursing job satisfaction (NJS), job stress (JS) and collaborative nurse-physician (N-P) relationships are important components of ANCC ?Forces of Magnetism?. N-P influenced costs and patient care effectiveness (Knaus, 2001). Human patient simulator (HPS) studies focus on medical residents, anesthesia and nursing students (Rogers, 2001; Schwid, 2002). Bruce (2003) evaluated ARNP's knowledge and clinical performance. HPS benefits- increased learning, retention and confidence outweighed difficulties of expense and time; providing state-of-art interactive learning knowledge, critical thinking, communication and teamwork skills (Morton, 2004; Nehring & Lashley, 2004). No documentation if collaborative NP teams lead to effective outcomes. Purpose: to assess LE, ORW, NJS, Stress and NP collaboration using Pediatric HPS ?Pam?. Conceptual Framework: King's (1981) time & perception concepts. Methodology: Research #1: What is NP collaboration level using Kramer/Schmalenberg's (2002) NP Scale (KSNPS), NACHRI Group Cohesion (GC), Collaboration & Satisfaction about Care Decisions (CSCD), LE, ORW, NJS and JS instruments. Research #2: What is relationship between instruments and HPS competency? Research design-descriptive, exploratory study. Participants- 18 Teams- 50 nurses and 55 medical residents (3 residents/3 nurses) in 3 ?mock code? scenarios videotaped with debriefing sessions. Findings. Mode age (28-32), 48% Hispanic, 62% female. Males had significant higher GC scores (F=4.94; df-1.99, p=.029), significantly higher collaboration & satisfaction with patient care decisions than females (F=8.35, df=1, p.005). KSNPS increased with each scenario. Although teams perceived collaboration, it evolved over time with no significant correlation between KSNPS, GC, CSCD, LE, OWS, NJS, JS and HPS scores. Discussion. 1st scenario residents communicated with each other as did nurses-to-nurses; 2nd nurse/residents communicated, evolving into ?working? teams; 3rd team more cohesive, communicated more effectively and genuinely listened to each other, regardless of rank. Conclusions Participants recognized deficiencies, reacted to crisis with additional knowledge, improved assessment and collaboration skills to save ?Pam?.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleLeader Empowerment, Work and Job Satisfaction and Nurse-Physician Collaboration Using Pediatric HPSen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/149003-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Leader Empowerment, Work and Job Satisfaction and Nurse-Physician Collaboration Using Pediatric HPS</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2005</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Messmer, Patricia R., PhD, RN, BC, FAAN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Miami Children's Hospital</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Nurse Researcher</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">patricia.messmer@mch.com</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Susana Barroso, RN, BSN; Jacqueline Gonzalez, ARNP, MSN, CNAA, BC</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Leader empowerment (LE), organization work satisfaction (OWS), nursing job satisfaction (NJS), job stress (JS) and collaborative nurse-physician (N-P) relationships are important components of ANCC ?Forces of Magnetism?. N-P influenced costs and patient care effectiveness (Knaus, 2001). Human patient simulator (HPS) studies focus on medical residents, anesthesia and nursing students (Rogers, 2001; Schwid, 2002). Bruce (2003) evaluated ARNP's knowledge and clinical performance. HPS benefits- increased learning, retention and confidence outweighed difficulties of expense and time; providing state-of-art interactive learning knowledge, critical thinking, communication and teamwork skills (Morton, 2004; Nehring &amp; Lashley, 2004). No documentation if collaborative NP teams lead to effective outcomes. Purpose: to assess LE, ORW, NJS, Stress and NP collaboration using Pediatric HPS ?Pam?. Conceptual Framework: King's (1981) time &amp; perception concepts. Methodology: Research #1: What is NP collaboration level using Kramer/Schmalenberg's (2002) NP Scale (KSNPS), NACHRI Group Cohesion (GC), Collaboration &amp; Satisfaction about Care Decisions (CSCD), LE, ORW, NJS and JS instruments. Research #2: What is relationship between instruments and HPS competency? Research design-descriptive, exploratory study. Participants- 18 Teams- 50 nurses and 55 medical residents (3 residents/3 nurses) in 3 ?mock code? scenarios videotaped with debriefing sessions. Findings. Mode age (28-32), 48% Hispanic, 62% female. Males had significant higher GC scores (F=4.94; df-1.99, p=.029), significantly higher collaboration &amp; satisfaction with patient care decisions than females (F=8.35, df=1, p.005). KSNPS increased with each scenario. Although teams perceived collaboration, it evolved over time with no significant correlation between KSNPS, GC, CSCD, LE, OWS, NJS, JS and HPS scores. Discussion. 1st scenario residents communicated with each other as did nurses-to-nurses; 2nd nurse/residents communicated, evolving into ?working? teams; 3rd team more cohesive, communicated more effectively and genuinely listened to each other, regardless of rank. Conclusions Participants recognized deficiencies, reacted to crisis with additional knowledge, improved assessment and collaboration skills to save ?Pam?.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:54:24Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:54:24Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.