2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/149247
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Test Item Analysis: Are We Testing What We Taught?
Abstract:
Test Item Analysis: Are We Testing What We Taught?
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2003
Author:Earp, Jaibun, PHD, ARNP
P.I. Institution Name:Florida A&M University School of Nursing
Title:Professor
Co-Authors:Uloma Onubogu, MEd, MSN, ARNP
Background: Multiple-choice tests remain the most common method used for evaluation; Poorly written items affect student performance. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between test item analysis and student performance in a nursing course. Method: A review of item analysis of 7 unit tests with regard to failure rate, good and poor items, items deleted, and items credited. Results: Failure rate ranged from 2 to 13 students(X=5.7). The mean poor items(<.5) was 10.7(50-60 item tests) with mean item deletion of 2.7. A correlation was found between the number of poor items and student failure rate(r= .87, p
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleTest Item Analysis: Are We Testing What We Taught?en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/149247-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Test Item Analysis: Are We Testing What We Taught?</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2003</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Earp, Jaibun, PHD, ARNP</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Florida A&amp;M University School of Nursing</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">easternmist@aol.com</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Uloma Onubogu, MEd, MSN, ARNP</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Background: Multiple-choice tests remain the most common method used for evaluation; Poorly written items affect student performance. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between test item analysis and student performance in a nursing course. Method: A review of item analysis of 7 unit tests with regard to failure rate, good and poor items, items deleted, and items credited. Results: Failure rate ranged from 2 to 13 students(X=5.7). The mean poor items(&lt;.5) was 10.7(50-60 item tests) with mean item deletion of 2.7. A correlation was found between the number of poor items and student failure rate(r= .87, p</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:58:46Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:58:46Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.