Quality of Clinical Teaching Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in BSN and ADN Programs in Japan: A Secondary Analysis

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/149797
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Quality of Clinical Teaching Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in BSN and ADN Programs in Japan: A Secondary Analysis
Abstract:
Quality of Clinical Teaching Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in BSN and ADN Programs in Japan: A Secondary Analysis
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Nakayama, Toshiko, RN, DNSc
P.I. Institution Name:National College of Nursing Japan
Title:Associate Professor
Co-Authors:Tomomi Kameoka, RN, DNSc; Naomi Funashima, RN, DNSc; Kumiko Hongo, RN, MNs; Hiroe Miura, RN, DNSc; Nobuko Yamashita, DNSc; Midori Sugimori, RN, BLL
[Scientific session research presentation] This study was a secondary analysis of data from a study on quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty in Japan. The participants in the original study were nursing faculty working at BSN, ADN, and diploma programs. To explore the quality of clinical teaching behaviors and related factors of nursing faculty, the data from BSN and ADN faculty in the original study were used. The conceptual framework included 29 attributes of nursing faculty as the independent variables, and the quality of clinical teaching behaviors as the dependent variables. The quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty was measured by the Scale of Clinical Teaching Behaviors(SCTB), and 29 attributes of them were measured by Faculty's Attributes Questionnaire (FAQ). The SCTB has 36 items, 5-point Likert-type scale, organized into 9 subscales, and has well-established reliability and validity (Nakayama et al., 2004). The FAQ has 29 multiple choice items, and the content validity was validated by a pilot study and a panel of experts. The participants received the two instruments by mail and completed them. One hundred thirty-one valid data were collected, and they were analyzed statistically. The mean score of SCTB was 139.2(SD=20.7). The subscale with the highest mean score was "Accept students' emotion" (mean=17.0, SD=2.5). The subscale with the lowest mean score was "Self-evaluate teaching behaviors based on students' performance" (mean=14.2, SD=3.0). Furthermore, the result showed that 3 of the 29 attributes significantly related to the quality of clinical teaching behaviors(p<.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted in order to identify the important factors of quality of clinical teaching behaviors, and the result indicated that ?clinical competence ?Beta=.296,p<.01) had the strongest relationship with the quality of clinical teaching behaviors (adjusted R2=.119,F=5.987,p<.001). These results suggested that clinical competence is the most important factor in improving the quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleQuality of Clinical Teaching Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in BSN and ADN Programs in Japan: A Secondary Analysisen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/149797-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Quality of Clinical Teaching Behaviors of Nursing Faculty in BSN and ADN Programs in Japan: A Secondary Analysis</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Nakayama, Toshiko, RN, DNSc</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">National College of Nursing Japan</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Associate Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">nakayamat@adm.ncn.ac.jp</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Tomomi Kameoka, RN, DNSc; Naomi Funashima, RN, DNSc; Kumiko Hongo, RN, MNs; Hiroe Miura, RN, DNSc; Nobuko Yamashita, DNSc; Midori Sugimori, RN, BLL</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Scientific session research presentation] This study was a secondary analysis of data from a study on quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty in Japan. The participants in the original study were nursing faculty working at BSN, ADN, and diploma programs. To explore the quality of clinical teaching behaviors and related factors of nursing faculty, the data from BSN and ADN faculty in the original study were used. The conceptual framework included 29 attributes of nursing faculty as the independent variables, and the quality of clinical teaching behaviors as the dependent variables. The quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty was measured by the Scale of Clinical Teaching Behaviors(SCTB), and 29 attributes of them were measured by Faculty's Attributes Questionnaire (FAQ). The SCTB has 36 items, 5-point Likert-type scale, organized into 9 subscales, and has well-established reliability and validity (Nakayama et al., 2004). The FAQ has 29 multiple choice items, and the content validity was validated by a pilot study and a panel of experts. The participants received the two instruments by mail and completed them. One hundred thirty-one valid data were collected, and they were analyzed statistically. The mean score of SCTB was 139.2(SD=20.7). The subscale with the highest mean score was &quot;Accept students' emotion&quot; (mean=17.0, SD=2.5). The subscale with the lowest mean score was &quot;Self-evaluate teaching behaviors based on students' performance&quot; (mean=14.2, SD=3.0). Furthermore, the result showed that 3 of the 29 attributes significantly related to the quality of clinical teaching behaviors(p&lt;.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted in order to identify the important factors of quality of clinical teaching behaviors, and the result indicated that ?clinical competence ?Beta=.296,p&lt;.01) had the strongest relationship with the quality of clinical teaching behaviors (adjusted R2=.119,F=5.987,p&lt;.001). These results suggested that clinical competence is the most important factor in improving the quality of clinical teaching behaviors of nursing faculty.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T10:09:43Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T10:09:43Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.