Utility of the Adult-Adolescent Inventory (AAPI-2 ) for the Child Abuse Prevention: A Comparative Study with the PACAP and the Child Care Worker's Evaluation

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/151741
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Utility of the Adult-Adolescent Inventory (AAPI-2 ) for the Child Abuse Prevention: A Comparative Study with the PACAP and the Child Care Worker's Evaluation
Abstract:
Utility of the Adult-Adolescent Inventory (AAPI-2 ) for the Child Abuse Prevention: A Comparative Study with the PACAP and the Child Care Worker's Evaluation
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2011
Author:Ueda, Reiko, PhD, RN
P.I. Institution Name:Okinawa Prefectural College of Nursing
Title:Professor emeritus
Co-Authors:Junko Miyazawa MSN, CNM, PHN, Lecturer
[22nd International Nursing Research Congress - Research Presentation] Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2) by Bavorek and Keene by comparing it with the Child worker's evaluation and the Pre-Assessment tool for the Child Abuse Prevention (PACAP), which had been developed by us and was reported at pacific institute of Nursing (PIN) 2009 Conference in Honolulu.
Methods:   A total of 96 caregivers foe children aged 0-5 who attended at a nursery school and the care workers in charge of the children in an island city. Okinawa, Japan, participated in this study. The AAPI-2, 40 item structured questionnaire with 5 sub-scales and the PACAP, 18-item semi-structured questionnaire with 4 areas, were administered to the caregivers, together with the care workers' evaluation of the child rearing attitude. 
Results: 1) Within the caregivers, 86%were mothers and 14% were fathers; 82.3% of children belonged to nuclear families; and the birth order was first born in 38% , second born in 35% and third born or more in 27%. 2) Total score of the AAPI-2 ranged 120-188, (147±13.6). The risk score of the PACAP ranged 0-10, (3.1±2.4). Fourteen subjects (14.6%) were evaluated as at risk by care workers. 3) Spearman's correlation coefficient between the AAPI-2 and care workers' evaluation was 0.38 (p<0.01) and that between the PACAP and care workers' evaluation was 0.22 (p<0.05). Agreement of risk cases among three assessments was only 21% (3 out of 14). 
Conclusion: The weakness and strength of each assessment were identified. The AAPI-2 seems to be useful in the second stage of the child maltreatment prevention, after its first stage using the PACAP.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleUtility of the Adult-Adolescent Inventory (AAPI-2 ) for the Child Abuse Prevention: A Comparative Study with the PACAP and the Child Care Worker's Evaluationen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/151741-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Utility of the Adult-Adolescent Inventory (AAPI-2 ) for the Child Abuse Prevention: A Comparative Study with the PACAP and the Child Care Worker's Evaluation</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2011</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Ueda, Reiko, PhD, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Okinawa Prefectural College of Nursing</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Professor emeritus</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">sat.ueda@nifty.com</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Junko Miyazawa MSN, CNM, PHN, Lecturer</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[22nd International Nursing Research Congress - Research Presentation] Purpose:&nbsp;The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2) by Bavorek and Keene by comparing it with the Child worker's evaluation and the Pre-Assessment tool for the Child Abuse Prevention (PACAP), which had been developed by us and was reported at pacific institute of Nursing (PIN) 2009 Conference in Honolulu. <br/>Methods:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A total of 96 caregivers foe children aged 0-5 who attended at a nursery school and the care workers in charge of the children in an island city. Okinawa, Japan, participated in this study. The AAPI-2, 40 item structured questionnaire with 5 sub-scales and the PACAP, 18-item semi-structured questionnaire with 4 areas, were administered to the caregivers, together with the care workers' evaluation of the child rearing attitude.&nbsp; <br/>Results:&nbsp;1) Within the caregivers, 86%were mothers and 14% were fathers; 82.3% of children belonged to nuclear families; and the birth order was first born in 38% , second born in 35% and third born or more in 27%. 2) Total score of the AAPI-2 ranged 120-188, (147&plusmn;13.6). The risk score of the PACAP ranged 0-10, (3.1&plusmn;2.4). Fourteen subjects (14.6%) were evaluated as at risk by care workers. 3) Spearman's correlation coefficient between the AAPI-2 and care workers' evaluation was 0.38 (p&lt;0.01) and that between the PACAP and care workers' evaluation was 0.22 (p&lt;0.05). Agreement of risk cases among three assessments was only 21% (3 out of 14).&nbsp; <br/>Conclusion:&nbsp;The weakness and strength of each assessment were identified. The AAPI-2 seems to be useful in the second stage of the child maltreatment prevention, after its first stage using the PACAP.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T11:12:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T11:12:12Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.