Evidence Based Practice in Providing Interdisciplinary EducationùAn Analysis of Results

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/152346
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Evidence Based Practice in Providing Interdisciplinary EducationùAn Analysis of Results
Abstract:
Evidence Based Practice in Providing Interdisciplinary EducationùAn Analysis of Results
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Gunnett, Ann E., MSN, MS, RN, BC
P.I. Institution Name:Johns Hopkins Bayveiw Medical Center
[Research Presentation] Best practice evidence emphasizes the value of a blended learning approach to delivery of intradisciplinary as well as interdisciplinary education.áThis project approached the ongoing basic life support education using the best practice approach of online self paced education combined with live scheduled sessions using the American Heart Association Practice While Watching format.áBasic life support education is a biannual requirement for health care providers.áLearners vary from individuals who have never performed basic life support to those who do it on a daily basis. The challenge was to provide education that is perceived as valuable to all learners, having learners be able to perform the skills necessary, while doing this in an efficient and effective manner.áThe following questions are addressed: How do learners evaluate the blended learning approach to BLS? How do learners perceive their ability to perform BLS if needed following education? Do learners evaluate education differently based on their experience in providing "real" basic life support? Do learners from different disciplines evaluate the education differently? How does instructor evaluation compare with learner evaluation?áAll participants and instructors were asked to evaluate the educational offering.áResults overwhelmingly supported the education process, with learners perceiving they would be able to perform BLS when needed, regardless of prior experience.áInstructor evaluations were congruent with learner evaluations.á Cost effectiveness of the approach was analyzed and recommendations based on over 500 participants will be presented.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleEvidence Based Practice in Providing Interdisciplinary EducationùAn Analysis of Resultsen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/152346-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Evidence Based Practice in Providing Interdisciplinary Education&ugrave;An Analysis of Results</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Gunnett, Ann E., MSN, MS, RN, BC</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Johns Hopkins Bayveiw Medical Center</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">agunnett@jhmi.edu</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Research Presentation] Best practice evidence emphasizes the value of a blended learning approach to delivery of intradisciplinary as well as interdisciplinary education.&aacute;This project approached the ongoing basic life support education using the best practice approach of online self paced education combined with live scheduled sessions using the American Heart Association Practice While Watching format.&aacute;Basic life support education is a biannual requirement for health care providers.&aacute;Learners vary from individuals who have never performed basic life support to those who do it on a daily basis. The challenge was to provide education that is perceived as valuable to all learners, having learners be able to perform the skills necessary, while doing this in an efficient and effective manner.&aacute;The following questions are addressed: How do learners evaluate the blended learning approach to BLS? How do learners perceive their ability to perform BLS if needed following education? Do learners evaluate education differently based on their experience in providing &quot;real&quot; basic life support? Do learners from different disciplines evaluate the education differently? How does instructor evaluation compare with learner evaluation?&aacute;All participants and instructors were asked to evaluate the educational offering.&aacute;Results overwhelmingly supported the education process, with learners perceiving they would be able to perform BLS when needed, regardless of prior experience.&aacute;Instructor evaluations were congruent with learner evaluations.&aacute; Cost effectiveness of the approach was analyzed and recommendations based on over 500 participants will be presented.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T11:32:53Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T11:32:53Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.