Nursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision-Making Improves Outcomes

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/153125
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Nursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision-Making Improves Outcomes
Abstract:
Nursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision-Making Improves Outcomes
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2009
Author:Sewell, Jeanne, MSN, RN
P.I. Institution Name:Georgia College & State University
Title:Assistant Professor
Co-Authors:Flor A. Culpa-Bondal, PhD, RN; Martha Colvin, PhD, RN
[Research Symposium Presentation] Purpose: The aim of this presentation is to describe how the process of systematic assessment of a bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) program triggered curriculum and policy changes. Lessons learned and opportunities for more comprehensive pertinent assessment methods are discussed. An instance of unexpected increase in the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) failure rate in 2002 prompted faculty members to implement a number of changes. Prominent changes included the introduction of an NCLEX preparation course that incorporated a remediation plan and an NCLEX simulation exam.  After much consideration, the faculty voted to adopt a progression policy that required students to pass the simulation exam prior to graduation from the university. Methods: Systematic program evaluation allowed faculty to reflect on best practices for teaching and learning in order to positively affect student outcomes on the NCLEX?.  Methods used to improve student outcomes included development of a remediation course, faculty-student mentoring at 1:8 ratios, and the addition of a NCLEX simulation examination.  Analysis of student performance was conducted each time the remediation course was taught. Data were also aggregated and analyzed for all courses taught using correlation and descriptive statistics. Results: The required passing score of 85 (now equivalent to 850) for the examination was the initial benchmark set in 2003. Using aggregated data for continuous program evaluation, the passing score was raised to 900 in 2008. The progression policy has had a positive impact on improving student performance. Conclusion: Evidence-based decision-making has dramatically improved NCLEX pass rates in this program, although it required faculty to make tough choices when making school policies.  Continued success will be dependent on support of progression policies at the administrative level.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleNursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision-Making Improves Outcomesen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/153125-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Nursing Program Assessment and Evaluation: Evidence-Based Decision-Making Improves Outcomes</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2009</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Sewell, Jeanne, MSN, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Georgia College &amp; State University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Assistant Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">jeanne.sewell@gcsu.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Flor A. Culpa-Bondal, PhD, RN; Martha Colvin, PhD, RN</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Research Symposium Presentation] Purpose: The aim of this presentation is to describe how the process of systematic assessment of a bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) program triggered curriculum and policy changes. Lessons learned and opportunities for more comprehensive pertinent assessment methods are discussed. An instance of unexpected increase in the&nbsp;National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) failure rate in 2002 prompted faculty members to implement a number of changes. Prominent changes included the introduction of an NCLEX preparation course that incorporated a remediation plan and an NCLEX simulation exam.&nbsp; After much consideration, the faculty voted to adopt a progression policy that required students to pass the simulation exam prior to graduation from the university. Methods: Systematic program evaluation allowed faculty to reflect on best practices for teaching and learning in order to positively affect student outcomes on the NCLEX?.&nbsp; Methods used to improve student outcomes included development of a remediation course, faculty-student mentoring at&nbsp;1:8 ratios, and the addition of a NCLEX simulation examination.&nbsp; Analysis of student performance was conducted each time the remediation course was taught. Data were also aggregated and analyzed for all courses taught using correlation and descriptive statistics. Results: The required passing score of 85 (now equivalent to 850) for the examination was the initial benchmark set in 2003. Using aggregated data for continuous program evaluation, the passing score was raised to 900 in 2008. The progression policy has had a positive impact on improving student performance. Conclusion: Evidence-based decision-making has dramatically improved NCLEX pass rates in this program, although it required faculty to make tough choices when making school policies.&nbsp; Continued success will be dependent on support of progression policies at the administrative level.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T12:03:36Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T12:03:36Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.