What's in a Name? A Comparative Study of the History of Intellectual Disabilities Nursing in the United Kingdom and United States

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/153766
Type:
Presentation
Title:
What's in a Name? A Comparative Study of the History of Intellectual Disabilities Nursing in the United Kingdom and United States
Abstract:
What's in a Name? A Comparative Study of the History of Intellectual Disabilities Nursing in the United Kingdom and United States
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2004
Conference Date:July 22-24, 2004
Author:Mitchell, Duncan, BA, RN, MA, PhD
P.I. Institution Name:University of Salford
Title:Professorial Fellow
Co-Authors:Wendy M. Nehring, RN, MS, PhD
Objective: This paper will report on a comparative historical study that considers similarities and differences between the development of intellectual disability nursing in the United States and the United Kingdom. Design: An historical study comparing the development of two similar areas of nursing in two countries. Years: The common period for comparison of primary material was 1895-1959. Methods: Themes from original research were shared in correspondence between the authors over an eighteen month period. The themes were originally restricted to those that were pertinent to both countries and these were then examined to identify differences between them. The primary sources were combinations of written archival evidence, personal collections, contemporary published material and oral history interviews. Interestingly both researchers discovered a paucity of accessible source material for the study of the nurses in both countries. Findings: Themes identified were - language (specifically of definition); nurses role in the development of community care; institutional cultures; influence of the eugenics movement on institutional services; methods of education for nurses; realtionships within nursing, and confusion with mental nursing; nurse registration and specialisation. Conclusions: Whilst there were common themes in the history of nursing between both cuntries, there were significant differences in the way that nursing developed and was organised. Similarities include the marginalisation of this area of work within nursing, its confusion with mental health nursing and a general confusion of professional definition and identity. There is also a shared history of institutional oppression that nurses in both countries have had to recognise in order to move forward as a professional group. Implications: Specialisms within nursing that have hitherto felt isolated within their own countries have significant international similarities. Comparative historical study of this nature help to build international nursing collaboration and enhance knowledge within the subject.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
22-Jul-2004
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleWhat's in a Name? A Comparative Study of the History of Intellectual Disabilities Nursing in the United Kingdom and United Statesen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/153766-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">What's in a Name? A Comparative Study of the History of Intellectual Disabilities Nursing in the United Kingdom and United States</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2004</td></tr><tr class="item-conference-date"><td class="label">Conference Date:</td><td class="value">July 22-24, 2004</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Mitchell, Duncan, BA, RN, MA, PhD</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of Salford</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Professorial Fellow</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">d.mitchell9@salford.ac.uk</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Wendy M. Nehring, RN, MS, PhD</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Objective: This paper will report on a comparative historical study that considers similarities and differences between the development of intellectual disability nursing in the United States and the United Kingdom. Design: An historical study comparing the development of two similar areas of nursing in two countries. Years: The common period for comparison of primary material was 1895-1959. Methods: Themes from original research were shared in correspondence between the authors over an eighteen month period. The themes were originally restricted to those that were pertinent to both countries and these were then examined to identify differences between them. The primary sources were combinations of written archival evidence, personal collections, contemporary published material and oral history interviews. Interestingly both researchers discovered a paucity of accessible source material for the study of the nurses in both countries. Findings: Themes identified were - language (specifically of definition); nurses role in the development of community care; institutional cultures; influence of the eugenics movement on institutional services; methods of education for nurses; realtionships within nursing, and confusion with mental nursing; nurse registration and specialisation. Conclusions: Whilst there were common themes in the history of nursing between both cuntries, there were significant differences in the way that nursing developed and was organised. Similarities include the marginalisation of this area of work within nursing, its confusion with mental health nursing and a general confusion of professional definition and identity. There is also a shared history of institutional oppression that nurses in both countries have had to recognise in order to move forward as a professional group. Implications: Specialisms within nursing that have hitherto felt isolated within their own countries have significant international similarities. Comparative historical study of this nature help to build international nursing collaboration and enhance knowledge within the subject.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T12:30:02Z-
dc.date.issued2004-07-22en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T12:30:02Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.