Specialist versus generalist nursing care: Impact on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/154264
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Specialist versus generalist nursing care: Impact on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract:
Specialist versus generalist nursing care: Impact on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Reid, Catherine Mary, RN, BN, honours
P.I. Institution Name:Epworth Hospital/Deakin University
Title:Registered Nurse, Research Assistant
Co-Authors:Mari Botti, RN, PhD; Rosemary Watts, RN, PhD; Libby Beale, RN and Helen Crowe, RN, BAppSci, GDip, Epi, Biostats, MNursSci
[Research Presentation] Background: Specialised hospital wards are designed to group personnel, experienced and trained in a specific area of medicine and patients according to their care requirements providing treatment relevant to the patient cohort needs. This paper reports an important secondary finding of a study centered on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Method: A prospective, descriptive, survey design was used to track patient recovery during two key transitions: acute (time in ward) and intermediate (7 days and 4 weeks) using the Urologic Surgery Patient Recovery Survey incorporating the Short Form 36, American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire, McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Due to an organisational restructure patients' data were considered according to postoperative care units: group one- specialist urology care, group two - generalist surgical care. Results: Prospective data have been analysed during two trajectories of recovery. Mean duration of surgery was 204 (SD = 15) minutes. Length of stay was 3 (SD =0.716) days for both groups. n the acute phase, group one patients reported pain as being mild in intensity, while group two reported moderate to high pain. Higher levels of mobility, mood and sleep were also evident for group one participants. In the intermediate phase key differences emerged, group one were better informed regarding wound care and pain management and hence better able to manage their recovery. Key intermediate trajectory qualitative themes to emerge from group two supported the acute trajectory findings. Discussion: Findings suggest that RARP patient group cared for in a specialist postoperative nursing environment experience a faster recovery with the provision of more effective patient management and education. These results provide the basis for development of evidence based practice guidelines to optimise care for this patient cohort.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleSpecialist versus generalist nursing care: Impact on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomyen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/154264-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Specialist versus generalist nursing care: Impact on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Reid, Catherine Mary, RN, BN, honours</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Epworth Hospital/Deakin University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Registered Nurse, Research Assistant</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">cathiereid@bigpond.com.au</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Mari Botti, RN, PhD; Rosemary Watts, RN, PhD; Libby Beale, RN and Helen Crowe, RN, BAppSci, GDip, Epi, Biostats, MNursSci</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Research Presentation] Background: Specialised hospital wards are designed to group personnel, experienced and trained in a specific area of medicine and patients according to their care requirements providing treatment relevant to the patient cohort needs. This paper reports an important secondary finding of a study centered on patient outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Method: A prospective, descriptive, survey design was used to track patient recovery during two key transitions: acute (time in ward) and intermediate (7 days and 4 weeks) using the Urologic Surgery Patient Recovery Survey incorporating the Short Form 36, American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire, McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Due to an organisational restructure patients' data were considered according to postoperative care units: group one- specialist urology care, group two - generalist surgical care. Results: Prospective data have been analysed during two trajectories of recovery. Mean duration of surgery was 204 (SD = 15) minutes. Length of stay was 3 (SD =0.716) days for both groups. n the acute phase, group one patients reported pain as being mild in intensity, while group two reported moderate to high pain. Higher levels of mobility, mood and sleep were also evident for group one participants. In the intermediate phase key differences emerged, group one were better informed regarding wound care and pain management and hence better able to manage their recovery. Key intermediate trajectory qualitative themes to emerge from group two supported the acute trajectory findings. Discussion: Findings suggest that RARP patient group cared for in a specialist postoperative nursing environment experience a faster recovery with the provision of more effective patient management and education. These results provide the basis for development of evidence based practice guidelines to optimise care for this patient cohort.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T12:51:58Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T12:51:58Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.