The Psychometric Properties of Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scales-Chinese (PIVRS-C)

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/154561
Type:
Presentation
Title:
The Psychometric Properties of Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scales-Chinese (PIVRS-C)
Abstract:
The Psychometric Properties of Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scales-Chinese (PIVRS-C)
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2004
Conference Date:July 22-24, 2004
Author:Liu, Justina Y. W., RN, MSC
P.I. Institution Name:The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Title:Ms.
Co-Authors:Joanne W.Y. Chung, RN, PhD; Thomas K. S. Wong, RN, PhD
Background: Culture and language have an essential effect on pain assessment. Most pain scales, however, used for assessing Chinese pain were directly translated from western versions. Pain scales developed in the West may not be able to reflect the pain experience among Chinese. Therefore, the C-PIVRS was constructed in consideration of unique Chinese cultural characteristics. Objective: This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Chinese pain intensity verbal rating scales (C-PIVRS). Design: This is a correlation comparative study. Sampling: Fifty Chinese speaking subjects were recruited by using convenience sampling. Method: Mechanical experimental pain was used to produce four levels of pain stimulation on subjects°¦ interphalangeal joints at random sequences. The subjects than rated their pain intensity on both the C-PIVRS and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The pain scores obtained from both scales were compared for satisfactory level of reliability and validity. Test / re-test were employed to verify consistency of the two pain scales. Findings: A consistency can be proved be the test / re-test correlation coefficient of the two pain scales (i.e. r = 0.92 for C-PIVRS and r = 0.91 for VAS). A good reliability can be shown by the intra-class correlation (ICC) which ranged from 0.78 to 0.90. In the factor analysis, a single factor emerged in each analysis. The first eigen values of each matrix were 3.42, 3.24, 3.17, and 3.29 for each level of experimental pain stimulation. This indicated that both pain scales were assessing the same pain dimension in terms of good validity. Conclusion: The two pain scales have a comparable level of reliability and validity for assessing pain intensity in Chinese adults. Implication: The selection of pain scales should consider the nature of the clients°¦ characteristics. The results of this study provide more choices in pain tools for assessing Chinese pain.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
22-Jul-2004
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleThe Psychometric Properties of Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scales-Chinese (PIVRS-C)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/154561-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">The Psychometric Properties of Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scales-Chinese (PIVRS-C)</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2004</td></tr><tr class="item-conference-date"><td class="label">Conference Date:</td><td class="value">July 22-24, 2004</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Liu, Justina Y. W., RN, MSC</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">The Hong Kong Polytechnic University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Ms.</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">hsjustina@inet.polyu.edu.hk</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Joanne W.Y. Chung, RN, PhD; Thomas K. S. Wong, RN, PhD</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Background: Culture and language have an essential effect on pain assessment. Most pain scales, however, used for assessing Chinese pain were directly translated from western versions. Pain scales developed in the West may not be able to reflect the pain experience among Chinese. Therefore, the C-PIVRS was constructed in consideration of unique Chinese cultural characteristics. Objective: This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Chinese pain intensity verbal rating scales (C-PIVRS). Design: This is a correlation comparative study. Sampling: Fifty Chinese speaking subjects were recruited by using convenience sampling. Method: Mechanical experimental pain was used to produce four levels of pain stimulation on subjects&deg;&brvbar; interphalangeal joints at random sequences. The subjects than rated their pain intensity on both the C-PIVRS and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The pain scores obtained from both scales were compared for satisfactory level of reliability and validity. Test / re-test were employed to verify consistency of the two pain scales. Findings: A consistency can be proved be the test / re-test correlation coefficient of the two pain scales (i.e. r = 0.92 for C-PIVRS and r = 0.91 for VAS). A good reliability can be shown by the intra-class correlation (ICC) which ranged from 0.78 to 0.90. In the factor analysis, a single factor emerged in each analysis. The first eigen values of each matrix were 3.42, 3.24, 3.17, and 3.29 for each level of experimental pain stimulation. This indicated that both pain scales were assessing the same pain dimension in terms of good validity. Conclusion: The two pain scales have a comparable level of reliability and validity for assessing pain intensity in Chinese adults. Implication: The selection of pain scales should consider the nature of the clients&deg;&brvbar; characteristics. The results of this study provide more choices in pain tools for assessing Chinese pain.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:05:48Z-
dc.date.issued2004-07-22en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:05:48Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.