Comparison of Intervention, Thinking and Feeling about the Seclusion and the Physical Restraint Between Doctors and Nurses

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/154866
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Comparison of Intervention, Thinking and Feeling about the Seclusion and the Physical Restraint Between Doctors and Nurses
Abstract:
Comparison of Intervention, Thinking and Feeling about the Seclusion and the Physical Restraint Between Doctors and Nurses
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2011
Author:Nagayama, Yutaka, MSN, RN
P.I. Institution Name:Kanazawa University
Title:Graduate Student In Doctoral Course
Co-Authors:Masami Hasegawa PhD, RN, Professor
[2nd International Nursing Research Conference for the World Academy of Nursing Science - Presentation] Purpose: This study is to compare intervention, thinking and feelings about the seclusion and the physical restraint in the psychiatric ward between the doctors and the nurses.
Methods: This study was analyzed by the qualitative inductive approach. The semi-structured interviews were done to collect data. Subjects; 12 doctors and 14 nurses. Average of doctor?s experience;12.9 years, average of nurse?s experience;8.1 years. Average of interview time;30 minutes. This study was started after approving from the Ethical Committee of Kanazawa University.
Results: 9 categories extracted both the doctors and the nurses; ?Secure safety in the whole of the ward?, ?Making up the imperfection of the ward?, ?Judgment on the necessity about the seclusion and the physical restraint?, ?Evasion of action limitation due to calming down?, ?Action limitation by rapid teamwork?, ?Releasing step by step?, ?Doubting to the non-treated side?, ?Dilemma to the unethical action?, ?Fear to the unstable patients?. 5 categories extracted by the doctors; ?Necessary and indispensable therapeutic procedure?, ?The prevention of the delay of treatment?, ?Use of nursing judgments?, ?Keeping the relation of treatment?, ?Keep understanding of the key person?. 3 categories extracted by the nurses; ?Nursing to self-care?, ?Gathering nursing date to release?, ?Check of the nursing date?. 
Conclusion: The doctor kept a constant distance with the patient, and was accomplishing treatments as a doctor in the process of the seclusion and the physical restraint. The nurse was aiming to regain the original life level of patients, and nurse was trying to support patient's daily life.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleComparison of Intervention, Thinking and Feeling about the Seclusion and the Physical Restraint Between Doctors and Nursesen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/154866-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Comparison of Intervention, Thinking and Feeling about the Seclusion and the Physical Restraint Between Doctors and Nurses</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2011</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Nagayama, Yutaka, MSN, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Kanazawa University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Graduate Student In Doctoral Course</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">cherry_banps753@yahoo.co.jp</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Masami Hasegawa PhD, RN, Professor</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[2nd International Nursing Research Conference for the World Academy of Nursing Science - Presentation] Purpose: This study is to compare intervention, thinking and feelings about the seclusion and the physical restraint in the psychiatric ward between the doctors and the nurses. <br/>Methods: This study was analyzed by the qualitative inductive approach. The semi-structured interviews were done to collect data. Subjects; 12 doctors and 14 nurses. Average of doctor?s experience;12.9 years, average of nurse?s experience;8.1 years. Average of interview time;30 minutes. This study was started after approving from the Ethical Committee of Kanazawa University. <br/>Results: 9 categories extracted both the doctors and the nurses; ?Secure safety in the whole of the ward?, ?Making up the imperfection of the ward?, ?Judgment on the necessity about the seclusion and the physical restraint?, ?Evasion of action limitation due to calming down?, ?Action limitation by rapid teamwork?, ?Releasing step by step?, ?Doubting to the non-treated side?, ?Dilemma to the unethical action?, ?Fear to the unstable patients?. 5 categories extracted by the doctors; ?Necessary and indispensable therapeutic procedure?, ?The prevention of the delay of treatment?, ?Use of nursing judgments?, ?Keeping the relation of treatment?, ?Keep understanding of the key person?. 3 categories extracted by the nurses; ?Nursing to self-care?, ?Gathering nursing date to release?, ?Check of the nursing date?.&nbsp; <br/>Conclusion: The doctor kept a constant distance with the patient, and was accomplishing treatments as a doctor in the process of the seclusion and the physical restraint. The nurse was aiming to regain the original life level of patients, and nurse was trying to support patient's daily life.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:20:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:20:32Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.