2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/154992
Type:
Presentation
Title:
IRB Issues: Are EBP Projects Research or Quality Improvement?
Abstract:
IRB Issues: Are EBP Projects Research or Quality Improvement?
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2010
Author:Bednarzyk, Michele S., DNP, FNP, BC
P.I. Institution Name:University of North Florida
Title:Instructor
Co-Authors:Kathaleen C. Bloom, PhD, CNM; Carol Ledbetter, PhD, FNP, BC, FAAN
21st INRC [Evidence-Based Practice Presentation] Evidence-Based practice (EBP) projects in clinical practice and in educational programs entail aspects of both research and quality improvement (QI). These projects are designed to methodically transform routine care using the best evidence regarding the impact of practices and treatments on patient outcomes. It is incumbent on persons engaged in EBP projects to be able to differentiate between research and QI. There is disagreement among the key players in determining the appropriate ethical oversight of EBP projects, mainly stemming from the question of whether they are considered research or QI activities. There are three possible scenarios: (1) purely QI activities that are exempt from IRB review, (2) research that is subject to IRB review, and (3) QI activities that are also research and so are subject to IRB review. This presentation will provide a discussion of the differences in these scenarios with exemplars of each.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleIRB Issues: Are EBP Projects Research or Quality Improvement?en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/154992-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">IRB Issues: Are EBP Projects Research or Quality Improvement?</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2010</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Bednarzyk, Michele S., DNP, FNP, BC</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of North Florida</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Instructor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">mbednarz@unf.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Kathaleen C. Bloom, PhD, CNM; Carol Ledbetter, PhD, FNP, BC, FAAN</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">21st INRC [Evidence-Based Practice Presentation] Evidence-Based practice (EBP) projects in clinical practice and in educational programs entail aspects of both research and quality improvement (QI). These projects are designed to methodically transform routine care using the best evidence regarding the impact of practices and treatments on patient outcomes. It is incumbent on persons engaged in EBP projects to be able to differentiate between research and QI. There is disagreement among the key players in determining the appropriate ethical oversight of EBP projects, mainly stemming from the question of whether they are considered research or QI activities. There are three possible scenarios: (1) purely QI activities that are exempt from IRB review, (2) research that is subject to IRB review, and (3) QI activities that are also research and so are subject to IRB review. This presentation will provide a discussion of the differences in these scenarios with exemplars of each.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:26:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:26:44Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.