The Impact of Physical Restraint Knowledge on Nursing Practice:áA Meta-Analysis

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/155107
Type:
Presentation
Title:
The Impact of Physical Restraint Knowledge on Nursing Practice:áA Meta-Analysis
Abstract:
The Impact of Physical Restraint Knowledge on Nursing Practice:áA Meta-Analysis
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2008
Author:Huang, Meichin, RN
P.I. Institution Name:Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University
Title:Nurse
Co-Authors:Yu-Chen Lin, RN; Wanling Chen, RN; Yi-Jan Wen, RN; Pei-Chun Li, RN; Yueh-Yen Fang, PhD
[Research Paper or Poster Presentation] There is an increase use of physical restraint in both longterm care and critical care facilities. Reduction in restraint use has become a quality indicator of critical care. Most studies of physical restraint in nursing had focused on the situations that caused physical restraint and nurses' attitude and behavior toward this practice. However, no literature provides an integrated discussion of these study results. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to integrate research findings on the relationship between knowledge and attitude, as well as knowledge and behavior of physical restraint among nurses. Random effect models were used to calculate combined effect sizes. Six Chinese and English databases were used to systematically locate both published and unpublished physical restraint literature in nursing up to year 2007. English databases used were MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Chinese databases used were CEPS, as well as the Chinese Journal Database and the Thesis/Dissertation Database developed by the National Library in Taiwan. The literature search applied key words of ærestraint', æphysical restraint', ærestraint knowledge', ærestraint attitude', æperception', æattitude toward restraint', æattitude and knowledge of restraint', æeducation', ænursing', ænurse'. Eight studies, provided 1,416 samples, met inclusion criteria were selected for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed consistent results among studies on the relationship between knowledge and attitude of restraint. Based on six studies (731 subjects), the combined effect presented a positive relationship between knowledge and attitude (r=.39, 95% CI= .24-.51, p<.001). Four studies with a pooled sample size of 765 subjects provided effect sizes for the relationship between knowledge and behavior of restraint. Inconsistent results were found between these studies. The combined effect of this relationship was not significant (r=.11, 95% CI= -.08-.29, p=.27). Results of this meta-analysis suggested that attitude of restraint may not predict actual behavior. In the future, more studies on restraint behavior are suggested.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleThe Impact of Physical Restraint Knowledge on Nursing Practice:áA Meta-Analysisen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/155107-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">The Impact of Physical Restraint Knowledge on Nursing Practice:&aacute;A Meta-Analysis</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2008</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Huang, Meichin, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Nurse</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">a591016a@yahoo.com.tw</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Yu-Chen Lin, RN; Wanling Chen, RN; Yi-Jan Wen, RN; Pei-Chun Li, RN; Yueh-Yen Fang, PhD</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Research Paper or Poster Presentation] There is an increase use of physical restraint in both longterm care and critical care facilities. Reduction in restraint use has become a quality indicator of critical care. Most studies of physical restraint in nursing had focused on the situations that caused physical restraint and nurses' attitude and behavior toward this practice. However, no literature provides an integrated discussion of these study results. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to integrate research findings on the relationship between knowledge and attitude, as well as knowledge and behavior of physical restraint among nurses. Random effect models were used to calculate combined effect sizes. Six Chinese and English databases were used to systematically locate both published and unpublished physical restraint literature in nursing up to year 2007. English databases used were MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Chinese databases used were CEPS, as well as the Chinese Journal Database and the Thesis/Dissertation Database developed by the National Library in Taiwan. The literature search applied key words of &aelig;restraint', &aelig;physical restraint', &aelig;restraint knowledge', &aelig;restraint attitude', &aelig;perception', &aelig;attitude toward restraint', &aelig;attitude and knowledge of restraint', &aelig;education', &aelig;nursing', &aelig;nurse'. Eight studies, provided 1,416 samples, met inclusion criteria were selected for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed consistent results among studies on the relationship between knowledge and attitude of restraint. Based on six studies (731 subjects), the combined effect presented a positive relationship between knowledge and attitude (r=.39, 95% CI= .24-.51, p&lt;.001). Four studies with a pooled sample size of 765 subjects provided effect sizes for the relationship between knowledge and behavior of restraint. Inconsistent results were found between these studies. The combined effect of this relationship was not significant (r=.11, 95% CI= -.08-.29, p=.27). Results of this meta-analysis suggested that attitude of restraint may not predict actual behavior. In the future, more studies on restraint behavior are suggested.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:32:44Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.