2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/155296
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Alternatives to Manual Cuff Blood Pressures on Bariatric Patients
Abstract:
Alternatives to Manual Cuff Blood Pressures on Bariatric Patients
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2007
Author:Thomas, Shirley A., RN, BSN, MPA
P.I. Institution Name:University of California /Davis Health System
Title:Manager
[Research Presentation] In one case study it was determined that the arterial blood pressure and manual blood pressure on one bariatric patient had as much as 18 mmHG difference. A chart review showed in the PACU a manual blood pressure that was consistently higher than the arterial blood pressure. I was tasked with investigating the state-of-the-art measurement of blood pressures or best practice for bariatric patients and to make recommendations of monitoring the blood pressures in bariatric patients for the hospital. We conducted an extensive literature review. We found very little published on the topic of vital signs on bariatric patients. There were references that made recommendations primarily for proper fitting of the manual cuff. All products in the studies were for home use only and could not be properly cleaned for infection control measures in the hospital. One new product referred to as a wrist sensor pressure device was discovered. We trialed the device for 2 weeks on staff members. The data results showed inconsistency in blood pressures from manual blood pressures of 30 mmHG or less and inconsistencies with the staffÆs stated known blood pressure. The device was significantly higher in nearly every case. The product was rejected. It was decided to adapt the vital signs policy to (1) watch for trending of blood pressures, (2) to properly fit the cuff and (3) to accept wrist manual blood pressures as an alternative to upper arm blood pressures if the proper cuff size was not available.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleAlternatives to Manual Cuff Blood Pressures on Bariatric Patientsen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/155296-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Alternatives to Manual Cuff Blood Pressures on Bariatric Patients</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2007</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Thomas, Shirley A., RN, BSN, MPA</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of California /Davis Health System</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Manager</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">shirley.thomas@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">[Research Presentation] In one case study it was determined that the arterial blood pressure and manual blood pressure on one bariatric patient had as much as 18 mmHG difference. A chart review showed in the PACU a manual blood pressure that was consistently higher than the arterial blood pressure. I was tasked with investigating the state-of-the-art measurement of blood pressures or best practice for bariatric patients and to make recommendations of monitoring the blood pressures in bariatric patients for the hospital. We conducted an extensive literature review. We found very little published on the topic of vital signs on bariatric patients. There were references that made recommendations primarily for proper fitting of the manual cuff. All products in the studies were for home use only and could not be properly cleaned for infection control measures in the hospital. One new product referred to as a wrist sensor pressure device was discovered. We trialed the device for 2 weeks on staff members. The data results showed inconsistency in blood pressures from manual blood pressures of 30 mmHG or less and inconsistencies with the staff&AElig;s stated known blood pressure. The device was significantly higher in nearly every case. The product was rejected. It was decided to adapt the vital signs policy to (1) watch for trending of blood pressures, (2) to properly fit the cuff and (3) to accept wrist manual blood pressures as an alternative to upper arm blood pressures if the proper cuff size was not available.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:42:53Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:42:53Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.