Comparing Effects of a Feeding Skills Training Program by Using Repeated Measures ANOVA and Individual Regression Analysis

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/155519
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Comparing Effects of a Feeding Skills Training Program by Using Repeated Measures ANOVA and Individual Regression Analysis
Abstract:
Comparing Effects of a Feeding Skills Training Program by Using Repeated Measures ANOVA and Individual Regression Analysis
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2006
Author:Chang, Chia-Chi, PhD, RN
P.I. Institution Name:China Medical University
Title:Assistant Professor
Co-Authors:Elizabeth A. Madigan, PhD, RN
Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis (IRA) are both used in the analysis of longitudinal data. The data from Chang et al (2005) study was used to illustrate the similarities and differences between the two methods. The purpose of the study was to test the effects of a feeding skills training program on nursing assistants? knowledge, attitude, perceived behavior control, and intention toward feeding dementia patients. The findings from repeated measures ANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p< 0.001) and greater intention (intention freq.: F=3.1, p=0.05) than control group after the training. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding direction magnitude, and timing of the change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different pattern of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p< 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (intention freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; intention beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups such that the treatment group outcomes were more positive. The differences between two methods should be examined at both the theoretical and practical levels. IRA was recommended for future nursing studies and the use of both methods as complementary is also suggested for the future studies.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleComparing Effects of a Feeding Skills Training Program by Using Repeated Measures ANOVA and Individual Regression Analysisen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/155519-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Comparing Effects of a Feeding Skills Training Program by Using Repeated Measures ANOVA and Individual Regression Analysis</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2006</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Chang, Chia-Chi, PhD, RN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">China Medical University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Assistant Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">ccchang@mail.cmu.edu.tw</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Elizabeth A. Madigan, PhD, RN</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Repeated measures ANOVA and individual regression analysis (IRA) are both used in the analysis of longitudinal data. The data from Chang et al (2005) study was used to illustrate the similarities and differences between the two methods. The purpose of the study was to test the effects of a feeding skills training program on nursing assistants? knowledge, attitude, perceived behavior control, and intention toward feeding dementia patients. The findings from repeated measures ANOVA concluded that treatment group had better knowledge (F=56, p&lt; 0.001) and greater intention (intention freq.: F=3.1, p=0.05) than control group after the training. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding direction magnitude, and timing of the change. Results from IRA indicated that there were significantly different pattern of change on knowledge (t=-4.8, p&lt; 0.001), attitude (t=1.8, p=0.07), perceived behavior control (t=1.9, p=0.06), and intention (intention freq.: t=-2.3, p=0.02; intention beliefs: t=-2.7, p=0.01) between two groups such that the treatment group outcomes were more positive. The differences between two methods should be examined at both the theoretical and practical levels. IRA was recommended for future nursing studies and the use of both methods as complementary is also suggested for the future studies.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T13:55:01Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T13:55:01Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.