2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/156093
Type:
Presentation
Title:
FAQs of Integrative Reviews: What, Where and How?
Abstract:
FAQs of Integrative Reviews: What, Where and How?
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2010
Author:Febre, Quincyann, BSN
P.I. Institution Name:Kaiser Permanente, West Los Angeles
Title:Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Nurse
Co-Authors:Alyssa Tashiro Morita, RN, BA, BSN; Cecelia L. Crawford, RN, MSN
21st INRC [Evidence-Based Practice Symposium Presentation] Integrative reviews are regarded as being research of research.ÿ Therefore, these reviews should meet the same thorough methodological standards as primary research in terms of clarity, rigor, and replication.ÿ In order to meet these rigorous research standards, many questions must be answered during the integrative review process.ÿ This presentation will provide the answers to several frequently asked questions of integrative reviews, which include (a) how to find the relevant evidence, (b) what counts as evidence, (c) bias control, and (d) expert opinion.ÿ Two completed integrative reviews will be used as exemplars to illustrate the difference between the clinical question driving the integrative review versus the searchable question driving the search for the evidence.ÿ Common pitfalls encountered during this part of the integrative review process will be described in detail throughout the presentation.ÿ The conclusion of the first presentation will provide a bridge to the second presentation by revisiting the role of the clinical question in the appraisal and grading of the relevant evidence.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleFAQs of Integrative Reviews: What, Where and How?en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/156093-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">FAQs of Integrative Reviews: What, Where and How?</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2010</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Febre, Quincyann, BSN</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Kaiser Permanente, West Los Angeles</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Nurse</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">qfebre@gmail.com</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Alyssa Tashiro Morita, RN, BA, BSN; Cecelia L. Crawford, RN, MSN</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">21st INRC [Evidence-Based Practice Symposium Presentation] Integrative reviews are regarded as being research of research.&yuml; Therefore, these reviews should meet the same thorough methodological standards as primary research in terms of clarity, rigor, and replication.&yuml; In order to meet these rigorous research standards, many questions must be answered during the integrative review process.&yuml; This presentation will provide the answers to several frequently asked questions of integrative reviews, which include (a) how to find the relevant evidence, (b) what counts as evidence, (c) bias control, and (d) expert opinion.&yuml; Two completed integrative reviews will be used as exemplars to illustrate the difference between the clinical question driving the integrative review versus the searchable question driving the search for the evidence.&yuml; Common pitfalls encountered during this part of the integrative review process will be described in detail throughout the presentation.&yuml; The conclusion of the first presentation will provide a bridge to the second presentation by revisiting the role of the clinical question in the appraisal and grading of the relevant evidence.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T14:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T14:26:51Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.