2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/156496
Type:
Presentation
Title:
The Systematic Review of Qualitative Findings
Abstract:
The Systematic Review of Qualitative Findings
Conference Sponsor:Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Year:2006
Author:Popay, Jennie, BA, PhD
P.I. Institution Name:The University of Lancaster
Title:Professor
Policy makers and practitioners face growing pressure to use a wide range of sources of evidence or ?intelligence? in making decisions about interventions, policy developments and practice interventions. They cannot confine themselves to the question ?what works?? but must addresses additional questions about the nature and significance of the problem to be addressed; the nature of proposed interventions; their differential impact; cost effectiveness; acceptability; and so on. To do this requires that they draw on a wide and diverse range of sources of evidence. This may include quantitative and qualitative research evidence informed by different disciplines and perspectives as well as none research evidence.  Methods for reviewing and synthesising quantitative research about effectiveness have developed rapidly. However, methods for synthesising other types of quantitative research, or for synthesising qualitative research, and for integrating this with quantitative research are less well developed. In this presentation the emergence of methods for the systematic review of diverse sources of research based evidence including but not restricted to qualitative research will be overviewed.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Sigma Theta Tau International

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleThe Systematic Review of Qualitative Findingsen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/156496-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">The Systematic Review of Qualitative Findings</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Sigma Theta Tau International</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2006</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Popay, Jennie, BA, PhD</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">The University of Lancaster</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">j.popay@lancaster.ac.uk</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Policy makers and practitioners face growing pressure to use a wide range of sources of evidence or ?intelligence? in making decisions about interventions, policy developments and practice interventions. They cannot confine themselves to the question ?what works?? but must addresses additional questions about the nature and significance of the problem to be addressed; the nature of proposed interventions; their differential impact; cost effectiveness; acceptability; and so on. To do this requires that they draw on a wide and diverse range of sources of evidence. This may include quantitative and qualitative research evidence informed by different disciplines and perspectives as well as none research evidence.&nbsp; Methods for reviewing and synthesising quantitative research about effectiveness have developed rapidly. However, methods for synthesising other types of quantitative research, or for synthesising qualitative research, and for integrating this with quantitative research are less well developed. In this presentation the emergence of methods for the systematic review of diverse sources of research based evidence including but not restricted to qualitative research will be overviewed.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T14:50:25Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T14:50:25Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipSigma Theta Tau Internationalen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.