Group Visit Intervention Impact on Shared Decision Making for Coronary Artery Disease

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/160945
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Group Visit Intervention Impact on Shared Decision Making for Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract:
Group Visit Intervention Impact on Shared Decision Making for Coronary Artery Disease
Conference Sponsor:Midwest Nursing Research Society
Conference Year:2010
Author:Dontje, Katherine, PhD
P.I. Institution Name:Michigan State University
Contact Address:11805 Wood Rd., Dewitt, MI, 48820, USA
Contact Telephone:517-432-0023
Co-Authors:K.J. Dontje, CON, Michigan State University, East Lansing , MI;
Purpose: The coronary artery disease shared decision making project (CAD-SDM) purpose is to provide a program of education and decision support tools for shared decision-making between patients and providers concerning coronary artery disease (CAD). The focus of this presentation is to describe the impact of a group visit intervention (GVI) on the participant's perceived knowledge about treatment options, shared decision making process and level of comfort in participating in treatment decisions. Methods: A convenience sample was identified of 570 individuals with CAD who were patients of a Midwestern Academic Health Center Group Practice. IRB approval has been obtained from the University for the CAD-SDM project. All participants are sent educational material about CAD treatment options. The participants are than contacted and scheduled to participate in the GVI plus shared decision making visit with provider or shared decision making visit only. The GVI is 90 minutes in length with 8-10 participants. The GVI facilitates participant's understanding of shared decision making and treatment options. Group visits will be transcribed for qualitative analysis. Perceived knowledge and shared decision-making participation will be evaluated by a pre- post survey method at the end of the group visit and the completion of the shared decision making visit. GVI will take place over a five month period of October 2009 to February 2010. Multiple regression analysis will be used to evaluate differences between participants who had GVI plus provider visits and those who had provider visit only. Results: GVI participants' experience will be described and used to revise the tools and GVI process. Comparisons between patients who chose to participate in the GVI plus provider visit and those who participate only in the shared decision making visit will suggest the areas of value added by the GVI. Implications: Patients are increasingly being asked to participate in shared decision making. However, there is little research describing ways to impact patients' knowledge gain, increase comfort and perceived skill with shared decision making. This research will provide new information on the GVI impact on shared decision making process.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Midwest Nursing Research Society

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleGroup Visit Intervention Impact on Shared Decision Making for Coronary Artery Diseaseen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/160945-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Group Visit Intervention Impact on Shared Decision Making for Coronary Artery Disease</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Midwest Nursing Research Society</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2010</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Dontje, Katherine, PhD</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Michigan State University</td></tr><tr class="item-address"><td class="label">Contact Address:</td><td class="value">11805 Wood Rd., Dewitt, MI, 48820, USA</td></tr><tr class="item-phone"><td class="label">Contact Telephone:</td><td class="value">517-432-0023</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">dontje@msu.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">K.J. Dontje, CON, Michigan State University, East Lansing , MI;</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Purpose: The coronary artery disease shared decision making project (CAD-SDM) purpose is to provide a program of education and decision support tools for shared decision-making between patients and providers concerning coronary artery disease (CAD). The focus of this presentation is to describe the impact of a group visit intervention (GVI) on the participant's perceived knowledge about treatment options, shared decision making process and level of comfort in participating in treatment decisions. Methods: A convenience sample was identified of 570 individuals with CAD who were patients of a Midwestern Academic Health Center Group Practice. IRB approval has been obtained from the University for the CAD-SDM project. All participants are sent educational material about CAD treatment options. The participants are than contacted and scheduled to participate in the GVI plus shared decision making visit with provider or shared decision making visit only. The GVI is 90 minutes in length with 8-10 participants. The GVI facilitates participant's understanding of shared decision making and treatment options. Group visits will be transcribed for qualitative analysis. Perceived knowledge and shared decision-making participation will be evaluated by a pre- post survey method at the end of the group visit and the completion of the shared decision making visit. GVI will take place over a five month period of October 2009 to February 2010. Multiple regression analysis will be used to evaluate differences between participants who had GVI plus provider visits and those who had provider visit only. Results: GVI participants' experience will be described and used to revise the tools and GVI process. Comparisons between patients who chose to participate in the GVI plus provider visit and those who participate only in the shared decision making visit will suggest the areas of value added by the GVI. Implications: Patients are increasingly being asked to participate in shared decision making. However, there is little research describing ways to impact patients' knowledge gain, increase comfort and perceived skill with shared decision making. This research will provide new information on the GVI impact on shared decision making process.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T23:13:20Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T23:13:20Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipMidwest Nursing Research Societyen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.