2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/161108
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Designing Study Nurses' Training to Enhance Research Integrity
Abstract:
Designing Study Nurses' Training to Enhance Research Integrity
Conference Sponsor:Midwest Nursing Research Society
Conference Year:2006
Author:Kossman, Susan, PhD, RN - Study Contact
P.I. Institution Name:Illinois State University
Title:Assistant Professor
Contact Address:College of Nursing, campus Box 5810, Normal, IL, 61790, USA
Contact Telephone:309 438-2553
Co-Authors:Gail R. Casper, PhD, RN; Dolores J. Severtson, PhD, RN; Pascale Carayon, PhD; Laura J. Burke, PhD, RN, FAAN; Marty Wilke, RN, BSN; Margarita Morales; Calvin Or, BS, MS; Anne-Sophie Grenier, BS; and Patricia F. Brennan, PhD, RN, FAAN
Adequate training of experimental and comparison group nurses in large field trials is essential to promote intervention integrity, but may be difficult to design, implement and evaluate. We developed a multi-level training program for home care nurses and patients enrolled in a field trial of an innovative nursing practice model, Technology Enhanced Practice (TEP), and the HeartCare II web resources that support this practice. Combining macro-ergonomic and train-the-trainer models we designed three waves of training. The first wave focused on training mentors - nurses and administrators to train and encourage study nurses prior to and during the trial. In the second wave, mentors train study nurses. The third wave occurs when TEP group nurses train patients to use the HeartCare web resources.

PowerPoint presentations with screen capture videos were developed to provide an overview of the study, nurse roles, and the experimental or comparison group intervention. The agency's evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines specifying objectives for nine home visits formed the training framework. Comparison nurses were taught to access the guidelines on the agency website as well as other online resources. TEP nurses were taught to use the HeartCare II web resources to access EBP guidelines annotated with references to HeartCare II tools. TEP nurses received a CD containing screen videos demonstrating use of the HeartCare II tools, navigation map, pocket guide, and case studies illustrating use of the TEP during several home visits.

Multi-level evaluation tools were designed for each training wave to provide feedback for continuous training improvement. The first wave evaluation tool assesses mentor's initial evaluation of the training, while the second wave tool asks mentors to evaluate their preparation to serve in the training role. Third wave evaluation assesses training performance by asking nurses to evaluate mentor performance in training. [Poster Presentation]
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Midwest Nursing Research Society

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleDesigning Study Nurses' Training to Enhance Research Integrityen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/161108-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Designing Study Nurses' Training to Enhance Research Integrity</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Midwest Nursing Research Society</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2006</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Kossman, Susan, PhD, RN - Study Contact</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">Illinois State University</td></tr><tr class="item-author-title"><td class="label">Title:</td><td class="value">Assistant Professor</td></tr><tr class="item-address"><td class="label">Contact Address:</td><td class="value">College of Nursing, campus Box 5810, Normal, IL, 61790, USA</td></tr><tr class="item-phone"><td class="label">Contact Telephone:</td><td class="value">309 438-2553</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">skossm@ilstu.edu</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Gail R. Casper, PhD, RN; Dolores J. Severtson, PhD, RN; Pascale Carayon, PhD; Laura J. Burke, PhD, RN, FAAN; Marty Wilke, RN, BSN; Margarita Morales; Calvin Or, BS, MS; Anne-Sophie Grenier, BS; and Patricia F. Brennan, PhD, RN, FAAN</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Adequate training of experimental and comparison group nurses in large field trials is essential to promote intervention integrity, but may be difficult to design, implement and evaluate. We developed a multi-level training program for home care nurses and patients enrolled in a field trial of an innovative nursing practice model, Technology Enhanced Practice (TEP), and the HeartCare II web resources that support this practice. Combining macro-ergonomic and train-the-trainer models we designed three waves of training. The first wave focused on training mentors - nurses and administrators to train and encourage study nurses prior to and during the trial. In the second wave, mentors train study nurses. The third wave occurs when TEP group nurses train patients to use the HeartCare web resources.<br/><br/>PowerPoint presentations with screen capture videos were developed to provide an overview of the study, nurse roles, and the experimental or comparison group intervention. The agency's evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines specifying objectives for nine home visits formed the training framework. Comparison nurses were taught to access the guidelines on the agency website as well as other online resources. TEP nurses were taught to use the HeartCare II web resources to access EBP guidelines annotated with references to HeartCare II tools. TEP nurses received a CD containing screen videos demonstrating use of the HeartCare II tools, navigation map, pocket guide, and case studies illustrating use of the TEP during several home visits. <br/><br/>Multi-level evaluation tools were designed for each training wave to provide feedback for continuous training improvement. The first wave evaluation tool assesses mentor's initial evaluation of the training, while the second wave tool asks mentors to evaluate their preparation to serve in the training role. Third wave evaluation assesses training performance by asking nurses to evaluate mentor performance in training. [Poster Presentation]</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T23:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T23:16:02Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipMidwest Nursing Research Societyen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.