2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/161316
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Pilot: Disability Related Outcomes of A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program
Abstract:
Pilot: Disability Related Outcomes of A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program
Conference Sponsor:Midwest Nursing Research Society
Conference Year:2004
Author:Hassanein, Salwa, MSN
Contact Address:Frances Payne Bolton SON, Center for Research, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106-4904, USA
Co-Authors:Georgia L Narsavage, PhD, RN, CS, ANP, Associate Professor
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are proposed to improve functional status and exercise performance, decrease dyspnea, and improve quality of life in individuals with chronic lung disease. The ATS (1999) determined a need to establish from an initial assessment which patients are likely to improve with a PR program. The aim of the proposed study is to identify the combination of contextual factors, resources, barriers and PR dose that best predicts disability-related outcomes in a population with chronic lung disease.Conceptual Framework: Stuifbergen’s Conceptual Model of Quality Of Life for People with Disabling Conditions (1995) was used. Method: IRB approval was obtained to complete a retrospective record analysis of 104 records for a power of .90 using an Alpha of .05 entering 20 variables with an estimated medium effect size of 0.3. Ten records were reviewed for the pilot. Sample: The sample had a mean age of 61.6 (SD 10.1) years; all were unemployed and retired. Mean smoking history was 50.4 (SD 34.1) yrs. Mean BMI was 30.8 (SD 6.09). Disability level (FEV1/FVC%) was 47.5% predicted; 60% reported depression and 90% reported anxiety. Comorbidity data revealed 40% with hypertension and 60% with diabetes. Results: PR program attendance averaged 21.8 (SD 2.1) sessions. The MET level differences between the 1st and last session were 2.05 (SD 1.28). The physical component summary (PCS) of SF-36 Quality of life was 40.9 (SD 28.5); norm for COPD=42.3. The mean of mental component summary (MCS) was 44.5 (SD 33.03); norm for COPD=44.5 (SD 12.3). Conclusion: The pilot verified inclusion/ revision of the 20 proposed variables, clarified the research questions, provided precision and consistency for the Data Abstraction Form, ensured availability of data, set a 1 year time frame to finish the data collection and set rules for abstracting data from PR records.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Midwest Nursing Research Society

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titlePilot: Disability Related Outcomes of A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/161316-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Pilot: Disability Related Outcomes of A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program </td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Midwest Nursing Research Society</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2004</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Hassanein, Salwa, MSN</td></tr><tr class="item-address"><td class="label">Contact Address:</td><td class="value">Frances Payne Bolton SON, Center for Research, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106-4904, USA</td></tr><tr class="item-co-authors"><td class="label">Co-Authors:</td><td class="value">Georgia L Narsavage, PhD, RN, CS, ANP, Associate Professor</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are proposed to improve functional status and exercise performance, decrease dyspnea, and improve quality of life in individuals with chronic lung disease. The ATS (1999) determined a need to establish from an initial assessment which patients are likely to improve with a PR program. The aim of the proposed study is to identify the combination of contextual factors, resources, barriers and PR dose that best predicts disability-related outcomes in a population with chronic lung disease.Conceptual Framework: Stuifbergen&rsquo;s Conceptual Model of Quality Of Life for People with Disabling Conditions (1995) was used. Method: IRB approval was obtained to complete a retrospective record analysis of 104 records for a power of .90 using an Alpha of .05 entering 20 variables with an estimated medium effect size of 0.3. Ten records were reviewed for the pilot. Sample: The sample had a mean age of 61.6 (SD 10.1) years; all were unemployed and retired. Mean smoking history was 50.4 (SD 34.1) yrs. Mean BMI was 30.8 (SD 6.09). Disability level (FEV1/FVC%) was 47.5% predicted; 60% reported depression and 90% reported anxiety. Comorbidity data revealed 40% with hypertension and 60% with diabetes. Results: PR program attendance averaged 21.8 (SD 2.1) sessions. The MET level differences between the 1st and last session were 2.05 (SD 1.28). The physical component summary (PCS) of SF-36 Quality of life was 40.9 (SD 28.5); norm for COPD=42.3. The mean of mental component summary (MCS) was 44.5 (SD 33.03); norm for COPD=44.5 (SD 12.3). Conclusion: The pilot verified inclusion/ revision of the 20 proposed variables, clarified the research questions, provided precision and consistency for the Data Abstraction Form, ensured availability of data, set a 1 year time frame to finish the data collection and set rules for abstracting data from PR records.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T23:19:25Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T23:19:25Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipMidwest Nursing Research Societyen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.