Preliminary findings of an evaluation of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care settings

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/161743
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Preliminary findings of an evaluation of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care settings
Abstract:
Preliminary findings of an evaluation of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care settings
Conference Sponsor:Midwest Nursing Research Society
Conference Year:2001
Author:Keenan, Gail
P.I. Institution Name:University of Michigan
Contact Address:College of Nursing 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0482, USA
Contact Telephone:734.763.3705
The purposes of the study are a) to examine the reliability and validity of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care units and b) to determine the core set of NANDAs, NICs, and NOCs for the units in Michigan. Data collection began in early 2000 and continues through June of 2001. We are currently evaluating 95 NOCs in an inner city Nurse Practitioner staffed ambulatory clinic, 88 NOCs in one home care site, and 90 NOCs in a second home care site. Patients are enrolled in the study by a registered nurse research associate (RNRA) at each test site. Once enrolled the RNRA accompanies the clinician and gathers the study data through observation of clinician, direct interaction with clinician, and interaction with the patient. Data collected on patients includes NANDAs and NICs, demographic and visit information; medical diagnoses, and scoring of applicable NOCs and the corresponding validation criteria measures. Clinicians independently score NOC labels and indicators selected by the RNRA for each patient. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) is computed and repeated if lower than .80. Initials findings show that the IRRs of most NOC labels to be at or above .80.
Repository Posting Date:
26-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
17-Oct-2011
Sponsors:
Midwest Nursing Research Society

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titlePreliminary findings of an evaluation of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care settingsen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/161743-
dc.description.abstract<table><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-title">Preliminary findings of an evaluation of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care settings</td></tr><tr class="item-sponsor"><td class="label">Conference Sponsor:</td><td class="value">Midwest Nursing Research Society</td></tr><tr class="item-year"><td class="label">Conference Year:</td><td class="value">2001</td></tr><tr class="item-author"><td class="label">Author:</td><td class="value">Keenan, Gail</td></tr><tr class="item-institute"><td class="label">P.I. Institution Name:</td><td class="value">University of Michigan</td></tr><tr class="item-address"><td class="label">Contact Address:</td><td class="value">College of Nursing 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0482, USA</td></tr><tr class="item-phone"><td class="label">Contact Telephone:</td><td class="value">734.763.3705</td></tr><tr class="item-email"><td class="label">Email:</td><td class="value">gkeenan@umich.edu</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="item-abstract">The purposes of the study are a) to examine the reliability and validity of NOC measures in home care and ambulatory care units and b) to determine the core set of NANDAs, NICs, and NOCs for the units in Michigan. Data collection began in early 2000 and continues through June of 2001. We are currently evaluating 95 NOCs in an inner city Nurse Practitioner staffed ambulatory clinic, 88 NOCs in one home care site, and 90 NOCs in a second home care site. Patients are enrolled in the study by a registered nurse research associate (RNRA) at each test site. Once enrolled the RNRA accompanies the clinician and gathers the study data through observation of clinician, direct interaction with clinician, and interaction with the patient. Data collected on patients includes NANDAs and NICs, demographic and visit information; medical diagnoses, and scoring of applicable NOCs and the corresponding validation criteria measures. Clinicians independently score NOC labels and indicators selected by the RNRA for each patient. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) is computed and repeated if lower than .80. Initials findings show that the IRRs of most NOC labels to be at or above .80.</td></tr></table>en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-26T23:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-17en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T23:26:35Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipMidwest Nursing Research Societyen_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.