2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/162018
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
The Accuracy Evaluation of Gynecologic Perioperative Nursing
Author(s):
Chuang, Chuang; Chuang, Fu-Lien; Wang, Shu-Ling
Author Details:
Chuang Chuang, MS, RN, Kaoshiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, email: flchuang@vghks.gov.tw; Fu-Lien Chuang, MS, RN; Shu-Ling Wang
Abstract:
Poster presented at AORN's 58th Annual Congress: Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of nursing anamneses which were filled out by the nurses, as well as evaluate the accuracy of implementation of surgical nursing procedures and postoperative caring process. Based on the results of this study, preoperative nursing programs have clinical significance in hospital management and can provide reference to the need of staff for hospital management. Method: In this study, we have examined the clinic implementation of 33 gynecological surgery cases, by random sampling, from August 2007 to January 2008. There are three disciplined observers to check the interaction between nurses and patients, and the nursing procedures in detail while staying in gynecological ward, OR, and POR at least 3.5 hours for each case. Meanwhile, we have also inspected 29 items of nursing procedures by according to the OR recommended implementation criteria which are set by AORN, in order to assess the correct conclusion. Result: According to the results, some suggestions were brought up. First of all, 18 of 29 items we observed can reach up to the goal of 100% accuracy. In other words, there are 62.07% (18/29=62.0 7%) items were accomplished without any flaw. After analyzing said 18 items which implented perfectly, we have found three items related to preoperative phase, seven items related to OR intraoperative phase, and eight items related to POR postoperative phase. Secondly, the accuracy ratio in postoperative phase is up to 99.50% while the accuracy ratio in OR intraoperative phase surgery is relatively low accuracy of only 95.3% respectively, partly because the human resources in each phase are different. Generally speaking, the overall accuracy is 98% though the lowest scored item is 90%
Repository Posting Date:
27-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
27-Oct-2011
Conference Date:
2011
Conference Name:
AORN 58th Annual Congress
Conference Host:
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses
Conference Location:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Description:
AORN 58th Annual Congress, 2011 held March 18, 2011 - March 24, 2011 in Philadelphia Convention Center
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_US
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleThe Accuracy Evaluation of Gynecologic Perioperative Nursingen_GB
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Chuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Fu-Lienen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shu-Lingen_US
dc.author.detailsChuang Chuang, MS, RN, Kaoshiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, email: flchuang@vghks.gov.tw; Fu-Lien Chuang, MS, RN; Shu-Ling Wangen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/162018-
dc.description.abstractPoster presented at AORN's 58th Annual Congress: Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of nursing anamneses which were filled out by the nurses, as well as evaluate the accuracy of implementation of surgical nursing procedures and postoperative caring process. Based on the results of this study, preoperative nursing programs have clinical significance in hospital management and can provide reference to the need of staff for hospital management. Method: In this study, we have examined the clinic implementation of 33 gynecological surgery cases, by random sampling, from August 2007 to January 2008. There are three disciplined observers to check the interaction between nurses and patients, and the nursing procedures in detail while staying in gynecological ward, OR, and POR at least 3.5 hours for each case. Meanwhile, we have also inspected 29 items of nursing procedures by according to the OR recommended implementation criteria which are set by AORN, in order to assess the correct conclusion. Result: According to the results, some suggestions were brought up. First of all, 18 of 29 items we observed can reach up to the goal of 100% accuracy. In other words, there are 62.07% (18/29=62.0 7%) items were accomplished without any flaw. After analyzing said 18 items which implented perfectly, we have found three items related to preoperative phase, seven items related to OR intraoperative phase, and eight items related to POR postoperative phase. Secondly, the accuracy ratio in postoperative phase is up to 99.50% while the accuracy ratio in OR intraoperative phase surgery is relatively low accuracy of only 95.3% respectively, partly because the human resources in each phase are different. Generally speaking, the overall accuracy is 98% though the lowest scored item is 90%en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-27T08:44:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-27en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-27T08:44:22Z-
dc.conference.date2011en_US
dc.conference.nameAORN 58th Annual Congressen_US
dc.conference.hostAssociation of periOperative Registered Nursesen_US
dc.conference.locationPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania, USAen_US
dc.descriptionAORN 58th Annual Congress, 2011 held March 18, 2011 - March 24, 2011 in Philadelphia Convention Centeren_US
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.