2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/165175
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE PAIN AND NURSING CARE QUALITY (PANCQ) SURVEY
Author(s):
Beck, Susan; Berry, Patricia; Brant, Jeannine; Smith, Ellen
Author Details:
Susan Beck, APRN PHD AOCN FAAN, Professor and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, email: susan.beck@nurs.utah.edu; Patricia Berry, PhD, APRN, BC-PCM; Jeannine Brant, RN, MS, AOCN, St. Vincent Healthcare, Billings, Montana; Ellen Smith, MS, APRN-BC, AOCN, Norris Cotton Cancer Center/Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Cent
Abstract:
Research to document the impact of oncology nurses on patient outcomes, such as pain, is an ONS priority. A significant barrier to such research is the inability to effectively measure the quality of nursing care. The most common approach, measures of patient satisfaction, tend to be global, e.g. overall satisfaction with nursing care and are usually temporally framed within the entire hospital stay. The purpose of this study was to establish the content validity of the PaNCQ survey. The ultimate goal is to develop a simple measure of the quality of nursing care related to pain management at the end of a nursing care shift in the acute care setting. This report summarizes developmental and judgmental phases of examining content validity of the PaNCQ. In the developmental phase, qualitative analysis of data from 34 patient interviews yielded an item pool (n=102) reflecting concepts identified by cancer patients as important to pain management quality of care: being treated right, safety net, efficacy of pain management, and partnership with the interdisciplinary team. Members of the research team individually rated the relevance of each item and collectively agreed to delete 19 items. PaNCQ Version 3, consisting of 88 items, was then reviewed by nine national pain management and nursing care quality experts. We used a 4-option rating scale (ranging from not relevant to relevant and succinct). Applying published and accepted criteria, we established content validity beyond the .05 level of significance if at least 8 of 9 experts agreed the item was relevant but needed minor alteration or if the item was very relevant and succinct. We took a liberal approach, meaning fewer items would be deleted. Based on the expert panel survey items were deleted, reworded, and added; 75 items remain which will now be tested systematically using cognitive interviewing and then in a large multi-site sample.
Repository Posting Date:
27-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
27-Oct-2011
Conference Date:
2007
Conference Name:
32nd Annual Oncology Nursing Society Congress
Conference Host:
Oncology Nursing Society
Conference Location:
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_US
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleCONTENT VALIDITY OF THE PAIN AND NURSING CARE QUALITY (PANCQ) SURVEYen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrant, Jeannineen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Ellenen_US
dc.author.detailsSusan Beck, APRN PHD AOCN FAAN, Professor and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, email: susan.beck@nurs.utah.edu; Patricia Berry, PhD, APRN, BC-PCM; Jeannine Brant, RN, MS, AOCN, St. Vincent Healthcare, Billings, Montana; Ellen Smith, MS, APRN-BC, AOCN, Norris Cotton Cancer Center/Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Centen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/165175-
dc.description.abstractResearch to document the impact of oncology nurses on patient outcomes, such as pain, is an ONS priority. A significant barrier to such research is the inability to effectively measure the quality of nursing care. The most common approach, measures of patient satisfaction, tend to be global, e.g. overall satisfaction with nursing care and are usually temporally framed within the entire hospital stay. The purpose of this study was to establish the content validity of the PaNCQ survey. The ultimate goal is to develop a simple measure of the quality of nursing care related to pain management at the end of a nursing care shift in the acute care setting. This report summarizes developmental and judgmental phases of examining content validity of the PaNCQ. In the developmental phase, qualitative analysis of data from 34 patient interviews yielded an item pool (n=102) reflecting concepts identified by cancer patients as important to pain management quality of care: being treated right, safety net, efficacy of pain management, and partnership with the interdisciplinary team. Members of the research team individually rated the relevance of each item and collectively agreed to delete 19 items. PaNCQ Version 3, consisting of 88 items, was then reviewed by nine national pain management and nursing care quality experts. We used a 4-option rating scale (ranging from not relevant to relevant and succinct). Applying published and accepted criteria, we established content validity beyond the .05 level of significance if at least 8 of 9 experts agreed the item was relevant but needed minor alteration or if the item was very relevant and succinct. We took a liberal approach, meaning fewer items would be deleted. Based on the expert panel survey items were deleted, reworded, and added; 75 items remain which will now be tested systematically using cognitive interviewing and then in a large multi-site sample.en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-27T12:13:51Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-27en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-27T12:13:51Z-
dc.conference.date2007en_US
dc.conference.name32nd Annual Oncology Nursing Society Congressen_US
dc.conference.hostOncology Nursing Societyen_US
dc.conference.locationLas Vegas, Nevada, USAen_US
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.