2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/182145
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Implementing Peer Review: A Magnet Approach to Effective Performance Appraisal
Author(s):
Davis, Karen
Author Details:
Karen Davis, RN, MS, NEA-BC, Director of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, email: kdavis4@jhmi.edu
Abstract:
Podium presentation, ANCC National Magnet Conference: An effective performance appraisal process is a key component of professional nursing practice. The peer review process is referred to frequently in Magnet Nursing Standards as a key element in professional nursing. The peer review process allows professionals from common practice areas to systematically assess, monitor, make judgments, and provide feedback to peers by comparing actual practice to established standards. Peer review can engage a multigenerational workforce and lead to more satisfied, engaged employees. As a component of the annual performance appraisal, peer review can create positive relationships, foster a better work environment, and allow peers to increase individual and group accountability. Peer review has many common elements that can be individualized to fit any type of unit or work culture. How to design, implement, and evaluate a unit based peer review program will be described. The content and steps outlined are intended to support front line staff nurses and nurse managers in implementing unit-specific peer review programs by focusing on existing expertise and best practices. The implementation steps are divided into five phases describing the introduction of concepts and getting nurses engaged, implementation guidelines, piloting the process, staff education, and ongoing evaluation. Tools and methods to collect feedback are described. Staff involvement is the key to a successful unit based peer review process.
Repository Posting Date:
28-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
28-Oct-2011
Conference Date:
2010
Conference Name:
ANCC National Magnet Conference
Conference Host:
American Nurses Credentialing Center
Conference Location:
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Description:
The 14th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 13-15 October, 2010 at the Phoenix Convention Center in Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_US
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleImplementing Peer Review: A Magnet Approach to Effective Performance Appraisalen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Karenen_US
dc.author.detailsKaren Davis, RN, MS, NEA-BC, Director of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, email: kdavis4@jhmi.eduen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/182145-
dc.description.abstractPodium presentation, ANCC National Magnet Conference: An effective performance appraisal process is a key component of professional nursing practice. The peer review process is referred to frequently in Magnet Nursing Standards as a key element in professional nursing. The peer review process allows professionals from common practice areas to systematically assess, monitor, make judgments, and provide feedback to peers by comparing actual practice to established standards. Peer review can engage a multigenerational workforce and lead to more satisfied, engaged employees. As a component of the annual performance appraisal, peer review can create positive relationships, foster a better work environment, and allow peers to increase individual and group accountability. Peer review has many common elements that can be individualized to fit any type of unit or work culture. How to design, implement, and evaluate a unit based peer review program will be described. The content and steps outlined are intended to support front line staff nurses and nurse managers in implementing unit-specific peer review programs by focusing on existing expertise and best practices. The implementation steps are divided into five phases describing the introduction of concepts and getting nurses engaged, implementation guidelines, piloting the process, staff education, and ongoing evaluation. Tools and methods to collect feedback are described. Staff involvement is the key to a successful unit based peer review process.en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-28T15:11:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-28en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T15:11:08Z-
dc.conference.date2010en_US
dc.conference.nameANCC National Magnet Conferenceen_US
dc.conference.hostAmerican Nurses Credentialing Centeren_US
dc.conference.locationPhoenix, Arizona, USAen_US
dc.descriptionThe 14th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 13-15 October, 2010 at the Phoenix Convention Center in Phoenix, Arizona, USA.en_US
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.