2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/182622
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Meaningful Peer Review Process Development
Author(s):
Palleschi, Catherine; Kilroy, Barbara
Author Details:
Catherine Palleschi, RN, ND, Maine Medical Center, Gorham, Maine, USA, email: pallec@mmc.org; Barbara Kilroy, RN, BSN
Abstract:
Poster Presentation: Purpose: Peer review has been part of each of the units for the past eight years. The team evaluated the strengths and opportunities with our present peer review process and created a new vision. The team focused on providing feedback that was fair and objective rather than subjective, highlighting the individual's strengths and areas for growth, and alignment with the units' code of conduct and human resource evaluation tool. The goal of the peer and self review process was to develop the individual to their fullest potential and align their activities to the mission of the hospital. Process /Methods: Literature search was performed and reviewed by members of the committee. Strengths and weakness to the present system were identified. The human resource and peer review tools were reviewed and a new form was created. The self evaluation tool was realigned with the key characteristics in the peer review tool and required the individual to list their strengths and opportunities for growth through goal setting. The innovative tool was sent to all staff for review and feedback. The final form was presented and adopted at each of the units' staff meetings. Peer review tools were developed also for the Certified Nursing Assistants and Nursing Unit Secretaries. Evaluation: We have successfully completed twelve peer and self reviews. Both the evaluator and evaluatee believe it is a much improved process and feel it is a balanced review. Staff believe it has increased their accountability, enhanced professional development and autonomy. References: 1. Anders, R. Feedback without fear. AORN. 74(6), December 2001: 882-884. 2. Barnes, B., Leis, S. et al. A Developmental Evaluation Process for Nurses: Enhancing Professional Excellence. JONA. 29(4), April 1999: 25-32 3. Mathews, D. Developing a Perioperative Peer Performance Appraisal System. AORN. December,2000: 72(6): 1039-1042. 4. Roper, K., Russell, G. The Effect of Peer Review on Professionalism, Autonomy, and Accountability. Journal of Staff Development. July August 1997:198-206. 5. Timmreck, T. Developing Successful Performance Appraisal through Choosing Appropriate Words to Effectively Describe Work. Heath Care Management Review. 1998 23(3):48-57.
Repository Posting Date:
28-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
28-Oct-2011
Conference Date:
2007
Conference Name:
ANCC National Magnet Conference
Conference Host:
American Nurses Credentialing Center
Conference Location:
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Description:
"Connect, Empower and Celebrate" was the theme of the 11th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 3-5 October, 2007 at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_US
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleMeaningful Peer Review Process Developmenten_GB
dc.contributor.authorPalleschi, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorKilroy, Barbaraen_US
dc.author.detailsCatherine Palleschi, RN, ND, Maine Medical Center, Gorham, Maine, USA, email: pallec@mmc.org; Barbara Kilroy, RN, BSNen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/182622-
dc.description.abstractPoster Presentation: Purpose: Peer review has been part of each of the units for the past eight years. The team evaluated the strengths and opportunities with our present peer review process and created a new vision. The team focused on providing feedback that was fair and objective rather than subjective, highlighting the individual's strengths and areas for growth, and alignment with the units' code of conduct and human resource evaluation tool. The goal of the peer and self review process was to develop the individual to their fullest potential and align their activities to the mission of the hospital. Process /Methods: Literature search was performed and reviewed by members of the committee. Strengths and weakness to the present system were identified. The human resource and peer review tools were reviewed and a new form was created. The self evaluation tool was realigned with the key characteristics in the peer review tool and required the individual to list their strengths and opportunities for growth through goal setting. The innovative tool was sent to all staff for review and feedback. The final form was presented and adopted at each of the units' staff meetings. Peer review tools were developed also for the Certified Nursing Assistants and Nursing Unit Secretaries. Evaluation: We have successfully completed twelve peer and self reviews. Both the evaluator and evaluatee believe it is a much improved process and feel it is a balanced review. Staff believe it has increased their accountability, enhanced professional development and autonomy. References: 1. Anders, R. Feedback without fear. AORN. 74(6), December 2001: 882-884. 2. Barnes, B., Leis, S. et al. A Developmental Evaluation Process for Nurses: Enhancing Professional Excellence. JONA. 29(4), April 1999: 25-32 3. Mathews, D. Developing a Perioperative Peer Performance Appraisal System. AORN. December,2000: 72(6): 1039-1042. 4. Roper, K., Russell, G. The Effect of Peer Review on Professionalism, Autonomy, and Accountability. Journal of Staff Development. July August 1997:198-206. 5. Timmreck, T. Developing Successful Performance Appraisal through Choosing Appropriate Words to Effectively Describe Work. Heath Care Management Review. 1998 23(3):48-57.en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-28T15:32:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-28en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T15:32:32Z-
dc.conference.date2007en_US
dc.conference.nameANCC National Magnet Conferenceen_US
dc.conference.hostAmerican Nurses Credentialing Centeren_US
dc.conference.locationAtlanta, Georgia, USAen_US
dc.description"Connect, Empower and Celebrate" was the theme of the 11th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 3-5 October, 2007 at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.en_US
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.