2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/182968
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Evaluation of Nursing Care - The Good, the Bad, the Ugly
Author(s):
Poduska, Donna
Author Details:
Donna Poduska, MS, RN, CNAA, Poudre Valley Hospital, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, email: ddp@pvhs.org
Abstract:
Poster Presentation: This presentation will address how we determined that a nursing process review was necessary in order to effectively evaluate nursing care. The Nursing Process Committee established review criteria consisting of consequences of untoward events related to: 1) nursing standards, 2) policy, procedures or protocols, 3) the nursing process, 4) system issues, and 5) patient condition/ diseases. Events can be referred to this committee via the Quality Resources (QR) department either through the quality assurance process, individual nurses or physicians, patient satisfaction issues or occurrence reports. If QR determines no further action is necessary, the information is given back to the reportee. If determination is that the base meets review criteria, it is assigned to a reviewer form the committee and the case is then reviewed and discussed at the committee meeting. The committee then agrees on the disposition of the case and whether it is an assessment, documentation, communication, intervention, or evaluation issue. The data arrived at from review of these charts allows clinical staff and managers to identify opportunities to enhance nursing practice in regards to quality effectiveness and/or efficiency through clinical vignettes. The nursing process review has been one more step toward a formal learning process involving discovery, discussion, and data analysis of nurse sensitive indicators, and other issues in order to improve and promote nursing clinical excellence and professionalism.
Repository Posting Date:
28-Oct-2011
Date of Publication:
28-Oct-2011
Conference Date:
2006
Conference Name:
ANCC National Magnet Conference
Conference Host:
American Nurses Credentialing Center
Conference Location:
Denver, Colorado, USA
Description:
10th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 4-6 October, 2006 at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado, USA.
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_US
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleEvaluation of Nursing Care - The Good, the Bad, the Uglyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPoduska, Donnaen_US
dc.author.detailsDonna Poduska, MS, RN, CNAA, Poudre Valley Hospital, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, email: ddp@pvhs.orgen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/182968-
dc.description.abstractPoster Presentation: This presentation will address how we determined that a nursing process review was necessary in order to effectively evaluate nursing care. The Nursing Process Committee established review criteria consisting of consequences of untoward events related to: 1) nursing standards, 2) policy, procedures or protocols, 3) the nursing process, 4) system issues, and 5) patient condition/ diseases. Events can be referred to this committee via the Quality Resources (QR) department either through the quality assurance process, individual nurses or physicians, patient satisfaction issues or occurrence reports. If QR determines no further action is necessary, the information is given back to the reportee. If determination is that the base meets review criteria, it is assigned to a reviewer form the committee and the case is then reviewed and discussed at the committee meeting. The committee then agrees on the disposition of the case and whether it is an assessment, documentation, communication, intervention, or evaluation issue. The data arrived at from review of these charts allows clinical staff and managers to identify opportunities to enhance nursing practice in regards to quality effectiveness and/or efficiency through clinical vignettes. The nursing process review has been one more step toward a formal learning process involving discovery, discussion, and data analysis of nurse sensitive indicators, and other issues in order to improve and promote nursing clinical excellence and professionalism.en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-28T15:48:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-28en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T15:48:22Z-
dc.conference.date2006en_US
dc.conference.nameANCC National Magnet Conferenceen_US
dc.conference.hostAmerican Nurses Credentialing Centeren_US
dc.conference.locationDenver, Colorado, USAen_US
dc.description10th American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) National Magnet Conference, held 4-6 October, 2006 at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado, USA.en_US
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission. Alternatively, please contact the conference host, journal, or publisher (according to the circumstance) for further details regarding this item. If a citation is listed in this record, the item has been published and is available via open-access avenues or a journal/database subscription. Contact your library for assistance in obtaining the as-published article.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.