2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/304099
Category:
Full-text
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Lessons Learned: Health Reform Commissions in Australia, England, USA and Canada
Author(s):
White, Jill F.; Chiarella, Mary
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Non-member
Author Details:
Jill F. White, RN, RM, BEd, MEd, PhD; Mary Chiarella, RN, LLB, (Hons), PhD
Abstract:

Session presented on: Monday, July 22, 2013

Purpose:

 The purpose of this paper is to share the lessons learned about nursing participation in health reform policy by analysing four key national health reform commission reports produced in four countries within the past five years.

Methods:

There were two major methods employed in this study. The first was document analysis of the key health reform policy reports and the government responses to these commission reports. This was followed by an expert reference group critical appraisal of these documents and their outcomes for each country following their release.

Results: The similarities and differences across these documents will be discussed. These include the degree of nursing input to the commission processes, the degree to which non-nurse participation was present, the methods by which the reports were released to the public and the actions of nursing organisations following report release.

Conclusion:

Each of the commission reports was consistent in seeinhg a major role for nursing in healthcare future scenarios; all indicated primary health care as the direction of health reform, each indicated aged care and chronic disease management in the community as essential. The effectiveness of the outcome was influenced by election timing and outcome, by nursing action both in informing the commission and mobilising on its release. The degree of political astuteness and maturity were significant features determining outcomes of reform processes. It was clear from this work that educational and experiential preparation of senior nurses to increase their level of political sophistication will enhance nursing input to and outcomes from reform processes.

Keywords:
influence; lessons learned; health policy
Repository Posting Date:
22-Oct-2013
Date of Publication:
22-Oct-2013
Conference Date:
2013
Conference Name:
24th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing
Conference Location:
Prague, Czech Republic
Description:
24th International Nursing Research Congress Theme: Bridge the Gap Between Research and Practice Through Collaboration. Held at the Hilton Prague Hotel.
Note:
Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoenen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.typePresentationen
dc.titleLessons Learned: Health Reform Commissions in Australia, England, USA and Canadaen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Jill F.en
dc.contributor.authorChiarella, Maryen
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen_GB
dc.author.detailsJill F. White, RN, RM, BEd, MEd, PhD; Mary Chiarella, RN, LLB, (Hons), PhDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/304099-
dc.description.abstract<p>Session presented on: Monday, July 22, 2013</p><b>Purpose: </b> <p> The purpose of this paper is to share the lessons learned about nursing participation in health reform policy by analysing four key national health reform commission reports produced in four countries within the past five years. <p><b>Methods: </b> <p>There were two major methods employed in this study. The first was document analysis of the key health reform policy reports and the government responses to these commission reports. This was followed by an expert reference group critical appraisal of these documents and their outcomes for each country following their release. <p><b>Results: </b>The similarities and differences across these documents will be discussed. These include the degree of nursing input to the commission processes, the degree to which non-nurse participation was present, the methods by which the reports were released to the public and the actions of nursing organisations following report release. <p><b>Conclusion: </b> <p>Each of the commission reports was consistent in seeinhg a major role for nursing in healthcare future scenarios; all indicated primary health care as the direction of health reform, each indicated aged care and chronic disease management in the community as essential. The effectiveness of the outcome was influenced by election timing and outcome, by nursing action both in informing the commission and mobilising on its release. The degree of political astuteness and maturity were significant features determining outcomes of reform processes. It was clear from this work that educational and experiential preparation of senior nurses to increase their level of political sophistication will enhance nursing input to and outcomes from reform processes.en_GB
dc.subjectinfluenceen
dc.subjectlessons learneden
dc.subjecthealth policyen
dc.date.available2013-10-22T20:29:06Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-22-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-22T20:29:06Z-
dc.conference.date2013en
dc.conference.name24th International Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursingen
dc.conference.locationPrague, Czech Republicen
dc.description24th International Nursing Research Congress Theme: Bridge the Gap Between Research and Practice Through Collaboration. Held at the Hilton Prague Hotel.en_GB
dc.description.noteItems submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.