Translation and Validation to the Portuguese Population of Individualized Care Scale

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/304283
Category:
Abstract
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Translation and Validation to the Portuguese Population of Individualized Care Scale
Author(s):
Amaral, Fernando
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Phi Xi
Author Details:
Fernando Amaral, RN, MsC, Amaral@esenfc.pt
Abstract:

Poster presented on: Tuesday, July 23, 2013, Monday, July 22, 2013

Purpose:

To describe the adaptation process of instrument Individualized Care, their translation process and methods to ensure the validation for the Portuguese population.
Methods:

 Focus group for discussing the conceptual equivalence

translation by two bilingual translatorsconsensus translation that was equivalent .  collaboration with 5 nursing professors chosen for convenience and research experience, all PhDs.

 four hospitals in the center of Portugal. patient in general medicine and surgery , March and April 2012.The sample consisted of patients, adults (age> 18 years) length of stay greater than 3 days,  read in Portuguese, no mental disorders, no severely ill and consented to participate guaranteed anonymity. patients placed the scale in a closed box. The opening by the research team.

For the psychometric properties was used Cronbach's alpha. assessement of adherence toof responses of missing values was used. construct's validity established based on an exploratory factor analysis using the principal components analysis with Varimax rotation. The value for KMO was 0.934 for the A part and the B is 0.916 and p <0.000 for the test of sphericity.the construct’s validity was established based on an exploratory factor analysis using a principal components analysis with Varimax rotation.

Results: 275 patients met the inclusion criteria, age between 16 and 95 , mean 63.57 years S = 17:41 years. average scores for ICS - A between 3.55 and 4.65, for ICS - B between 3.83 and 4.71.response rate ranges A -  96% and 99.3%.  B response rate between 91.6% and 96.7%. factor analysis,  extract three factors for the ICS-A explain 64,396% of the variance, for ICS – B tree factors explain 64,115% of the variance.

Conclusion: Despite the challenges, we believe that the resulting instrument is acceptable to be used for the Portuguese population, since the response rate per item is quite high, with very few cases of missing data.

Keywords:
individualized care; psychometric validation; cultural validation
Repository Posting Date:
22-Oct-2013
Date of Publication:
22-Oct-2013
Conference Date:
2013
Conference Name:
24th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing
Conference Location:
Prague, Czech Republic
Description:
24th International Nursing Research Congress Theme: Bridge the Gap Between Research and Practice Through Collaboration. Held at the Hilton Prague Hotel.
Note:
This is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen_GB
dc.type.categoryAbstracten_GB
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.titleTranslation and Validation to the Portuguese Population of Individualized Care Scaleen_GB
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Fernandoen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentPhi Xien_GB
dc.author.detailsFernando Amaral, RN, MsC, Amaral@esenfc.pten_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/304283-
dc.description.abstract<p>Poster presented on: Tuesday, July 23, 2013, Monday, July 22, 2013</p><b>Purpose: </b> <p><span class="hps alt-edited">To describe the</span> <span class="hps alt-edited">adaptation process of</span> <span class="hps">instrument</span> <span class="hps">Individualized</span> <span class="hps">Care</span>, their <span class="hps">translation process</span> <span class="hps">and methods</span> <span class="hps">to ensure the</span> <span class="hps">validation for the</span> <span class="hps">Portuguese population</span>.<br /="/"><b>Methods: </b> <p> Focus group for discussing the conceptual equivalence <p><span class="hps">translation</span> <span class="hps">by two</span> <span class="hps">bilingual</span> <span class="hps">translators</span>.  <span class="hps">consensus</span> <span class="hps">translation</span> <span class="hps">that was</span> <span class="hps">equivalent</span> <span class="hps">.</span> <span class="hps"> collaboration</span> <span class="hps">with 5</span> <span class="hps">nursing professors</span> <span class="hps">chosen for convenience</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">research experience</span>, <span class="hps">all</span> <span class="hps">PhDs</span>. <p> four hospitals in the center of Portugal. patient in general medicine and surgery , March and April 2012.<span class="hps">The</span> <span class="hps">sample consisted of</span> <span class="hps">patients</span>, <span class="hps">adults</span> <span class="hps atn">(</span>age> <span class="hps">18 years)</span> <span class="hps">length of stay</span> <span class="hps">greater than 3</span> <span class="hps">days,</span> <span class="hps"> read</span> <span class="hps">in Portuguese</span>, no <span class="hps">mental disorders</span>, <span class="hps">no </span><span class="hps">severely ill and</span> <span class="hps">consented</span> <span class="hps">to participate</span> . <span class="hps alt-edited"><span class="hps"> guaranteed anonymity</span>. <span class="hps">patients</span> <span class="hps">placed</span> the scale <span class="hps">in a</span> <span class="hps">closed box</span>. <span class="hps">The opening</span> <span class="hps">by the research team</span>.</span><p>For the psychometric properties was used Cronbach's alpha. assessement of adherence toof responses of missing values was used. construct's validity established based on an exploratory factor analysis using the principal components analysis with Varimax rotation. The value for KMO was 0.934 for the A part and the B is 0.916 and p <0.000 for the test of sphericity.the construct’s validity was established based on an exploratory factor analysis using a principal components analysis with Varimax rotation. <p><b>Results: </b><span class="hps">275</span> <span class="hps">patients </span><span class="hps">met the</span> <span class="hps">inclusion criteria</span>, <span class="hps">age</span> <span class="hps">between</span> <span class="hps">16 and</span> <span class="hps">95</span> , <span class="hps">mean</span> <span class="hps">63.57</span> <span class="hps">years</span> <span class="hps">S</span> <span class="hps">=</span> <span class="hps">17:41</span> <span class="hps">years</span>. <span class="hps">average <span class="hps">scores</span> <span class="hps">for</span> <span class="hps">ICS</span> <span class="hps">-</span> <span class="hps">A</span> <span class="hps">between</span> <span class="hps">3.55 and</span> <span class="hps">4.65</span>, <span class="hps">for</span> <span class="hps">ICS</span> <span class="hps">-</span> <span class="hps">B</span> <span class="hps">between</span> <span class="hps">3.83</span> <span class="hps">and 4.71.<span class="hps">response rate</span> <span class="hps">ranges A - </span> <span class="hps">96</span>% and <span class="hps">99.3</span>%.  <span class="hps">B</span> <span class="hps">response rate </span><span class="hps">between</span> <span class="hps">91.6%</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">96.7%</span>. factor analysis,  extract three factors for the ICS-A explain 64,396% of the variance, for ICS – B tree factors explain 64,115% of the variance. </span></span><p><b>Conclusion: </b><span class="hps">Despite the challenges</span>, we believe that <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">resulting</span> <span class="hps">instrument</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span class="hps">acceptable to</span> <span class="hps">be used for the</span> <span class="hps">Portuguese population</span>, <span class="hps">since the</span> <span class="hps">response rate</span> <span class="hps">per item</span> <span class="hps">is quite high</span>, <span class="hps">with very few</span> <span class="hps">cases of</span> <span class="hps">missing</span> <span class="hps">data.</span>en_GB
dc.subjectindividualized careen_GB
dc.subjectpsychometric validationen_GB
dc.subjectcultural validationen_GB
dc.date.available2013-10-22T20:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-22-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-22T20:32:44Z-
dc.conference.date2013en_GB
dc.conference.name24th International Nursing Research Congressen_GB
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursingen_GB
dc.conference.locationPrague, Czech Republicen_GB
dc.description24th International Nursing Research Congress Theme: Bridge the Gap Between Research and Practice Through Collaboration. Held at the Hilton Prague Hotel.en_GB
dc.description.noteThis is an abstract-only submission. If the author has submitted a full-text item based on this abstract, you may find it by browsing the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by author. If author contact information is available in this abstract, please feel free to contact him or her with your queries regarding this submission.en_GB
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.