Relationship Between Families Perception of Health and Family Support in Vulnerable Children Care

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/335109
Category:
Full-text
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Relationship Between Families Perception of Health and Family Support in Vulnerable Children Care
Other Titles:
Family Health Promotion
Author(s):
Chen, Jih-Yuan; Chen, Hong-Sen; Liu, Meng-Chi; Chao, Mei-Chyn
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Non-member
Author Details:
Jih-Yuan Chen, PhD, RN, jiyuch@kmu.edu.tw; Hong-Sen Chen, PhD; Meng-Chi Liu, MSN; Mei-Chyn Chao, MD
Abstract:
Session presented on Sunday, July 27, 2014: Purpose: Background: Family support in care of vulnerable children is rarely discussed yet has a major impact on family member health. The vulnerable children care setting is characterized by a rare disease of genetic, behaviors disturbed, or disability health. Family perceptions of health in relation to various outcomes of the children have including family health and family support has not been explored exclusively in outpatient care. Aim: First, assess families' perception of health associate with their children in different vulnerable care. Second, examine families' perception of health with a defined sample of vulnerable children in psychiatric clinic, genetic counseling clinic, and muscular dystrophy institute, using the Duke Health Profile (DUKE). Third, explore the relationship between 286 families' perception of health and family support in vulnerable children care. Methods: The study used secondary data to present the study aims. An aggregated data used for this research was part of three studies funded by a southern Medical University Hospital in Taiwan that constructed family health promotion model aimed at improving vulnerable children care health and family support of two clinics in one hospital and one setting in an Institute. Multiple unit/clinic comparisons were analyzed by ANOVA. The final was explored using regression model for the data measuring by the DUKE and Family APGAR (FAPGAR). Results: The sample of parents/family members/patients included family have children with muscular dystrophy attention deficiency and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and chromosomal abnormality. The Cronbach's of the DUKE and the FAPGAR are .71 and .88. Significant differences between clinics/setting were noted for the subscales of physical health, mental health, perceived health, and the overall score. Self-esteem received highest score, social health receiving the second higher score in the sample. Significant differences between the three study period/different samples were noted for the subscales of physical health, perceived health, and the overall score (F = 5.90, 9.11, and 3.26; P = .01, .01, and .04, respectively). Significant differences in family support score, and subscale of adaptation and partnership score were noted between setting/clinics (F = 2.57, 3.12 and .16; p = .05, .03, and .03, respectively). The final regression model, social health is predictor accounting for 31% of the variance in family support. Adjust variance attributable to the social health was .28, which was significantly different from zero, F 10,275 = 12.09, p = .001. Conclusion: The internal consistency of subscales of positive health were higher than the DMD and SMA group, the ADHD group, and in 1999 and 1997's. Higher scores in subscales of negative health/anxiety, depression, and anxiety-depression for DMD and SMA group compared with ADHD or chromosome abnormal group. In 2007, DMD group's caregiver perceived higher scores in physical health, perceived health, and overall health than DMD and SMA group in 2012. DMD and SMA group reported higher scores in adaptability and partnership than those ADHD group. The results were impressive, perceived health and perceived self-esteem exists in muscular dystrophy group or ADHD were lower than the chromosome abnormal group. DMD and SMA group reported higher scores in adaptability and partnership than those ADHD group.
Keywords:
family health promotion,; family health; family nursing
Repository Posting Date:
17-Nov-2014
Date of Publication:
17-Nov-2014 ; 17-Nov-2014
Other Identifiers:
INRC14L05
Conference Date:
2014
Conference Name:
25th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing
Conference Location:
Hong Kong
Description:
International Nursing Research Congress, 2014 Theme: Engaging Colleagues: Improving Global Health Outcomes. Held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Wanchai, Hong Kong

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.typePresentationen
dc.titleRelationship Between Families Perception of Health and Family Support in Vulnerable Children Careen
dc.title.alternativeFamily Health Promotionen
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jih-Yuanen
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hong-Senen
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Meng-Chien
dc.contributor.authorChao, Mei-Chynen
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen
dc.author.detailsJih-Yuan Chen, PhD, RN, jiyuch@kmu.edu.tw; Hong-Sen Chen, PhD; Meng-Chi Liu, MSN; Mei-Chyn Chao, MDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/335109-
dc.description.abstractSession presented on Sunday, July 27, 2014: Purpose: Background: Family support in care of vulnerable children is rarely discussed yet has a major impact on family member health. The vulnerable children care setting is characterized by a rare disease of genetic, behaviors disturbed, or disability health. Family perceptions of health in relation to various outcomes of the children have including family health and family support has not been explored exclusively in outpatient care. Aim: First, assess families' perception of health associate with their children in different vulnerable care. Second, examine families' perception of health with a defined sample of vulnerable children in psychiatric clinic, genetic counseling clinic, and muscular dystrophy institute, using the Duke Health Profile (DUKE). Third, explore the relationship between 286 families' perception of health and family support in vulnerable children care. Methods: The study used secondary data to present the study aims. An aggregated data used for this research was part of three studies funded by a southern Medical University Hospital in Taiwan that constructed family health promotion model aimed at improving vulnerable children care health and family support of two clinics in one hospital and one setting in an Institute. Multiple unit/clinic comparisons were analyzed by ANOVA. The final was explored using regression model for the data measuring by the DUKE and Family APGAR (FAPGAR). Results: The sample of parents/family members/patients included family have children with muscular dystrophy attention deficiency and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and chromosomal abnormality. The Cronbach's of the DUKE and the FAPGAR are .71 and .88. Significant differences between clinics/setting were noted for the subscales of physical health, mental health, perceived health, and the overall score. Self-esteem received highest score, social health receiving the second higher score in the sample. Significant differences between the three study period/different samples were noted for the subscales of physical health, perceived health, and the overall score (F = 5.90, 9.11, and 3.26; P = .01, .01, and .04, respectively). Significant differences in family support score, and subscale of adaptation and partnership score were noted between setting/clinics (F = 2.57, 3.12 and .16; p = .05, .03, and .03, respectively). The final regression model, social health is predictor accounting for 31% of the variance in family support. Adjust variance attributable to the social health was .28, which was significantly different from zero, F 10,275 = 12.09, p = .001. Conclusion: The internal consistency of subscales of positive health were higher than the DMD and SMA group, the ADHD group, and in 1999 and 1997's. Higher scores in subscales of negative health/anxiety, depression, and anxiety-depression for DMD and SMA group compared with ADHD or chromosome abnormal group. In 2007, DMD group's caregiver perceived higher scores in physical health, perceived health, and overall health than DMD and SMA group in 2012. DMD and SMA group reported higher scores in adaptability and partnership than those ADHD group. The results were impressive, perceived health and perceived self-esteem exists in muscular dystrophy group or ADHD were lower than the chromosome abnormal group. DMD and SMA group reported higher scores in adaptability and partnership than those ADHD group.en
dc.subjectfamily health promotion,en
dc.subjectfamily healthen
dc.subjectfamily nursingen
dc.date.available2014-11-17T13:44:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-17-
dc.date.issued2014-11-17en
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-17T13:44:28Z-
dc.conference.date2014en
dc.conference.name25th International Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursingen
dc.conference.locationHong Kongen
dc.descriptionInternational Nursing Research Congress, 2014 Theme: Engaging Colleagues: Improving Global Health Outcomes. Held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Wanchai, Hong Kongen
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.