Comparing Face-to-Face and Email Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Survivors: Technologies Influence Nursing

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/601877
Category:
Full-text
Format:
Text-based Document
Type:
Presentation
Title:
Comparing Face-to-Face and Email Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Survivors: Technologies Influence Nursing
Other Titles:
Promoting Health among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence [Session]
Author(s):
Constantino, Rose E.
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Eta
Author Details:
Rose E. Constantino, RN, FAAN, FACFE, rco100@pitt.edu
Abstract:
Session presented on Monday, July 27, 2015: Purpose: The purpose of the study to explore the use of''email-delivered HELPP'intervention and compare it with a face-to-face delivered intervention focused on health, education, and legal information/services (HELLP)' was designed for IPV survivors. 'As the conceptual framework, the Ecological Model (EM) by the World Health Organization (WHO) targeted the personal, interpersonal, and community domains of women surviving IPV. Specific problems within domains included the: personal domain (anxiety and depression); interpersonal (anger and personal support); and community (social support)'Methods: A mixed methods design was employed. The quantitative data from the Promise short form (PROMIS Cooperative Group, 2008), the Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ) (Brandt & Weinert, 1981) and The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL)(Cohen & Hoberman, 1983) were analyzed using T-test, and'' ANOVA. . The Health, Education on Safety, and Legal Support Participant Preferred Intervention (HELPP) was delivered weekly online and face-to-face for six weeks. Results: The HELPP intervention (1) significantly decreased anxiety (p<0.05), depression (p<0.05), and anger (p<0.05) and (2) significantly increased personal and social support (p,<0.05) in the Email group compared with the face-to-face group.' Conclusions: The HELPP information and intervention was shown to be feasible, acceptable, and effective among IPV survivors compared to participants in the Email and face-to-face groups with much more significant outcomes in the email group.. Given the increased use of online and mobile health intervention, we need to find best evidence in delivering interventions in the most economical, feasible, and timely manner. Further research could be conducted to determine if email alone or email plus mobile devices are more useful to deliver the HELPP intervention and influence the delivery of nursing care globally.
Keywords:
Intimate Partner Violence; Ecological Model; HELPP Intervention
Repository Posting Date:
17-Mar-2016
Date of Publication:
17-Mar-2016 ; 17-Mar-2016
Other Identifiers:
INRC15M13
Conference Date:
2015
Conference Name:
26th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing
Conference Location:
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Description:
Research Congress 2015 Theme: Question Locally, Engage Regionally, Apply Globally. Held at the Puerto Rico Convention Center.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoenen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.typePresentationen
dc.titleComparing Face-to-Face and Email Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Survivors: Technologies Influence Nursingen
dc.title.alternativePromoting Health among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence [Session]en
dc.contributor.authorConstantino, Rose E.en
dc.contributor.departmentEtaen
dc.author.detailsRose E. Constantino, RN, FAAN, FACFE, rco100@pitt.eduen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/601877-
dc.description.abstractSession presented on Monday, July 27, 2015: Purpose: The purpose of the study to explore the use of''email-delivered HELPP'intervention and compare it with a face-to-face delivered intervention focused on health, education, and legal information/services (HELLP)' was designed for IPV survivors. 'As the conceptual framework, the Ecological Model (EM) by the World Health Organization (WHO) targeted the personal, interpersonal, and community domains of women surviving IPV. Specific problems within domains included the: personal domain (anxiety and depression); interpersonal (anger and personal support); and community (social support)'Methods: A mixed methods design was employed. The quantitative data from the Promise short form (PROMIS Cooperative Group, 2008), the Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ) (Brandt & Weinert, 1981) and The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL)(Cohen & Hoberman, 1983) were analyzed using T-test, and'' ANOVA. . The Health, Education on Safety, and Legal Support Participant Preferred Intervention (HELPP) was delivered weekly online and face-to-face for six weeks. Results: The HELPP intervention (1) significantly decreased anxiety (p<0.05), depression (p<0.05), and anger (p<0.05) and (2) significantly increased personal and social support (p,<0.05) in the Email group compared with the face-to-face group.' Conclusions: The HELPP information and intervention was shown to be feasible, acceptable, and effective among IPV survivors compared to participants in the Email and face-to-face groups with much more significant outcomes in the email group.. Given the increased use of online and mobile health intervention, we need to find best evidence in delivering interventions in the most economical, feasible, and timely manner. Further research could be conducted to determine if email alone or email plus mobile devices are more useful to deliver the HELPP intervention and influence the delivery of nursing care globally.en
dc.subjectIntimate Partner Violenceen
dc.subjectEcological Modelen
dc.subjectHELPP Interventionen
dc.date.available2016-03-17T12:57:56Zen
dc.date.issued2016-03-17-
dc.date.issued2016-03-17en
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-17T12:57:56Zen
dc.conference.date2015en
dc.conference.name26th International Nursing Research Congressen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursingen
dc.conference.locationSan Juan, Puerto Ricoen
dc.descriptionResearch Congress 2015 Theme: Question Locally, Engage Regionally, Apply Globally. Held at the Puerto Rico Convention Center.en
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.