National Survey of Opinions and Preferences About the Required Culminating Project of DNP Programs

22.00
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/603906
Category:
Full-text
Type:
Presentation
Title:
National Survey of Opinions and Preferences About the Required Culminating Project of DNP Programs
Other Titles:
Issues Affecting Educators [Session]
Author(s):
Daroszewski, Ellen Beth
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Gamma Tau
Author Details:
Ellen Beth Daroszewski, RN, NP, CNS, PHN, Ellen.Daroszewski@Phoenix.edu
Abstract:
Session presented on Saturday, April 9, 2016: The growth and maturation of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs has prompted continuing curricular discussion and debate, especially regarding the required culminating program scholarship which has taken on a variety of forms and designations. There has even been argument that any sort of final project should not be required in practice-focused education. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2006) describes the final scholarship of DNP education as ... "a practice application-oriented “final DNP project,” which is an integral part of the integrative practice experience” (p. 4), allowing individual programs to delineate this application-based product. A 10 question online survey was administered anonymously via Survey Monkey from June to October 2014 to examine the opinions and preferences of DNPs and academics involved in doctoral nursing education about the required DNP program final product. The survey collected demographic information; opinions about the necessity and rigor of a final project, and the use of the term “dissertation” for the project; and preferences for what a final project should be called. An invitation to participate and a link to the survey were posted on a national DNP online community blog, and e-mailed to the leadership and DNP faculty of DNP programs across the country with an attempt to invite individuals from as many DNP programs as possible to complete the survey. A diverse sample of 849 respondents from 49 states (except South Dakota), Canada and Puerto Rico completed the survey. DNPs accounted for 54.9% (465) of the sample, 24% (203) were DNP students, 15.1% (128) were not DNPs but taught in DNP programs, and 2.2. % (19) were doctoral nursing educators who were not DNPs and did not teach DNPs. Academia was reported by 48.75% (411) of the respondents as their primary employment, 32.45% (2730) reported practice employment, and 9.6% (81) identified themselves as administrators. The average age of the respondents was 51.4 (SD 9.5), 90.6% (765) were female and 9.4% (79) were male. The average numbers of years in nursing was 26.3 (SD 11). As a whole the sample represented experienced academics and clinicians. Seventy six percent (642) of the respondents felt that a culminating scholarly project should be required in DNP education, with 78.9% (662) reporting that if a culminating project was required that it should have the same expectations of rigor as other doctoral nursing education culminating projects such as PhD dissertations. Over half (53.4%; 450) felt that the term “dissertation” should not be restricted to designate only the culminating projects of nursing PhD programs. Slightly less than a third (31.1%; 253) felt DNP culminating projects should be called “dissertations,” 29.1% (237) felt they should be called “capstones,” 25.5% (207) chose “projects,” 3.9% (32) chose “thesis, and 10.3% (84) “other.” Subgroup analyses demonstrated age-based, regional, and degree-based variation in responses. Many unsolicited comments were collected via the blog page and direct e-mails to the researchers. The comments represented a wide variety of passionate opinions about the final DNP project and the future of DNP education.
Keywords:
Doctoral nursing education; DNP education; Culminating DNP program scholarship
Repository Posting Date:
29-Mar-2016
Date of Publication:
29-Mar-2016
Other Identifiers:
NERC16F03
Conference Date:
2016
Conference Name:
Nursing Education Research Conference 2016
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing, and National League for Nursing
Conference Location:
Washington, DC
Description:
Nursing Education Research Conference Theme: Research as a Catalyst for Transformative Practice

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.typePresentationen
dc.titleNational Survey of Opinions and Preferences About the Required Culminating Project of DNP Programsen
dc.title.alternativeIssues Affecting Educators [Session]en
dc.contributor.authorDaroszewski, Ellen Bethen
dc.contributor.departmentGamma Tauen
dc.author.detailsEllen Beth Daroszewski, RN, NP, CNS, PHN, Ellen.Daroszewski@Phoenix.eduen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/603906en
dc.description.abstractSession presented on Saturday, April 9, 2016: The growth and maturation of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs has prompted continuing curricular discussion and debate, especially regarding the required culminating program scholarship which has taken on a variety of forms and designations. There has even been argument that any sort of final project should not be required in practice-focused education. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2006) describes the final scholarship of DNP education as ... "a practice application-oriented “final DNP project,” which is an integral part of the integrative practice experience” (p. 4), allowing individual programs to delineate this application-based product. A 10 question online survey was administered anonymously via Survey Monkey from June to October 2014 to examine the opinions and preferences of DNPs and academics involved in doctoral nursing education about the required DNP program final product. The survey collected demographic information; opinions about the necessity and rigor of a final project, and the use of the term “dissertation” for the project; and preferences for what a final project should be called. An invitation to participate and a link to the survey were posted on a national DNP online community blog, and e-mailed to the leadership and DNP faculty of DNP programs across the country with an attempt to invite individuals from as many DNP programs as possible to complete the survey. A diverse sample of 849 respondents from 49 states (except South Dakota), Canada and Puerto Rico completed the survey. DNPs accounted for 54.9% (465) of the sample, 24% (203) were DNP students, 15.1% (128) were not DNPs but taught in DNP programs, and 2.2. % (19) were doctoral nursing educators who were not DNPs and did not teach DNPs. Academia was reported by 48.75% (411) of the respondents as their primary employment, 32.45% (2730) reported practice employment, and 9.6% (81) identified themselves as administrators. The average age of the respondents was 51.4 (SD 9.5), 90.6% (765) were female and 9.4% (79) were male. The average numbers of years in nursing was 26.3 (SD 11). As a whole the sample represented experienced academics and clinicians. Seventy six percent (642) of the respondents felt that a culminating scholarly project should be required in DNP education, with 78.9% (662) reporting that if a culminating project was required that it should have the same expectations of rigor as other doctoral nursing education culminating projects such as PhD dissertations. Over half (53.4%; 450) felt that the term “dissertation” should not be restricted to designate only the culminating projects of nursing PhD programs. Slightly less than a third (31.1%; 253) felt DNP culminating projects should be called “dissertations,” 29.1% (237) felt they should be called “capstones,” 25.5% (207) chose “projects,” 3.9% (32) chose “thesis, and 10.3% (84) “other.” Subgroup analyses demonstrated age-based, regional, and degree-based variation in responses. Many unsolicited comments were collected via the blog page and direct e-mails to the researchers. The comments represented a wide variety of passionate opinions about the final DNP project and the future of DNP education.en
dc.subjectDoctoral nursing educationen
dc.subjectDNP educationen
dc.subjectCulminating DNP program scholarshipen
dc.date.available2016-03-29T13:12:19Zen
dc.date.issued2016-03-29en
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-29T13:12:19Zen
dc.conference.date2016en
dc.conference.nameNursing Education Research Conference 2016en
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing, and National League for Nursingen
dc.conference.locationWashington, DCen
dc.descriptionNursing Education Research Conference Theme: Research as a Catalyst for Transformative Practiceen
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.