Evaluating Debriefing Methods For High Fidelity Simulation

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/620639
Category:
Full-text
Format:
Text-based Document
Type:
Article
Level of Evidence:
Literature Review
Research Approach:
N/A
Title:
Evaluating Debriefing Methods For High Fidelity Simulation
Author(s):
Glesmann, Sabrina; Kastner, Angela; Venteicher, Monika
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Non-member
Author Details:
Sabrina Glesmann, BSN, RN, email: sabrina.glesmann@methodistcollege.edu; Angela Kastner, BSN, RN, email: angela.kastner@methodistcollege.edu; Monika Venteicher, BSN, RN, email: monika.venteicher@methodistcollege.edu
Abstract:

The purpose of this study is evaluating effectiveness of debriefing. The PICO(T) question asks “for nurse educators debriefing in simulation (P) how does using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) method (I) compared to other simulation debriefing methods (C) influence simulation debriefing effectiveness as evidenced by a debriefing evaluation?” Simulation creates problems for educators to ensure the experience meets best practice standards and guarantee quality learning opportunities. A comprehensive literature search was completed using online databases for evidenced based peer reviewed articles. Faculty driven debriefing, high-fidelity simulation, debriefing comparisons, effective debriefing, and the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Method (DML) were inclusion criteria.

Keywords:
Simulation; Debriefing
CINAHL Headings:
Simulations; Student Performance Appraisal; Student Knowledge--Evaluation; Students, Nursing; Student Knowledge
Repository Posting Date:
22-Sep-2016
Date of Publication:
22-Sep-2016
Note:
This work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository.
Degree:
MSN
Degree Year:
2016

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoenen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.evidence.levelLiterature Reviewen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.titleEvaluating Debriefing Methods For High Fidelity Simulationen
dc.contributor.authorGlesmann, Sabrinaen
dc.contributor.authorKastner, Angelaen
dc.contributor.authorVenteicher, Monikaen
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen
dc.author.detailsSabrina Glesmann, BSN, RN, email: sabrina.glesmann@methodistcollege.edu; Angela Kastner, BSN, RN, email: angela.kastner@methodistcollege.edu; Monika Venteicher, BSN, RN, email: monika.venteicher@methodistcollege.eduen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/620639-
dc.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this study is evaluating effectiveness of debriefing. The PICO(T) question asks “for nurse educators debriefing in simulation (P) how does using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) method (I) compared to other simulation debriefing methods (C) influence simulation debriefing effectiveness as evidenced by a debriefing evaluation?” Simulation creates problems for educators to ensure the experience meets best practice standards and guarantee quality learning opportunities. A comprehensive literature search was completed using online databases for evidenced based peer reviewed articles. Faculty driven debriefing, high-fidelity simulation, debriefing comparisons, effective debriefing, and the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Method (DML) were inclusion criteria.</p>en
dc.subjectSimulationen
dc.subjectDebriefingen
dc.subject.cinahlSimulationsen
dc.subject.cinahlStudent Performance Appraisalen
dc.subject.cinahlStudent Knowledge--Evaluationen
dc.subject.cinahlStudents, Nursingen
dc.subject.cinahlStudent Knowledgeen
dc.date.available2016-09-22T17:47:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-22-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-22T17:47:54Z-
dc.description.noteThis work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository.-
thesis.degree.levelMSNen
thesis.degree.year2016-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.