Quick and Easy Peer Review Processes: Too Good To Be True, Avoid Predatory Journal Traps

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/622872
Category:
Full-text
Format:
Text-based Document
Type:
Presentation
Level of Evidence:
N/A
Research Approach:
N/A
Title:
Quick and Easy Peer Review Processes: Too Good To Be True, Avoid Predatory Journal Traps
Other Titles:
Professional Practice
Author(s):
Edie, Alison H.; Conklin, Jamie L.; Oermann, Marilyn
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Beta Omicron
Author Details:
Alison H. Edie, DNP, MSN, BSN; Marilyn Oermann, PhD, MSN, BSN -- School of Nursing, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Jamie L. Conklin, MSLIS, Duke Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine the legitimacy of the peer review process as described in the publishing guidelines in predatory nursing journals. We will highlight the red flags of predatory journals that promote quick peer review for speedy publication that trap unsuspecting authors.

Keywords:
Peer Review; Predatory Journals; Publishing; Nursing Literature
Repository Posting Date:
28-Sep-2017
Date of Publication:
28-Sep-2017
Other Identifiers:
CONV17I16
Conference Date:
2017
Conference Name:
44th Biennial Convention
Conference Host:
Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing
Conference Location:
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Description:
44th Biennial Convention 2017 Theme: Influence Through Action: Advancing Global Health, Nursing, and Midwifery.
Note:
Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository, unless otherwise noted.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.typePresentationen
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.titleQuick and Easy Peer Review Processes: Too Good To Be True, Avoid Predatory Journal Trapsen_US
dc.title.alternativeProfessional Practiceen
dc.contributor.authorEdie, Alison H.en
dc.contributor.authorConklin, Jamie L.en
dc.contributor.authorOermann, Marilynen
dc.contributor.departmentBeta Omicronen
dc.author.detailsAlison H. Edie, DNP, MSN, BSN; Marilyn Oermann, PhD, MSN, BSN -- School of Nursing, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Jamie L. Conklin, MSLIS, Duke Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USAen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/622872-
dc.description.abstract<p><span>The purpose of this study was to examine the legitimacy of the peer review process as described in the publishing guidelines in predatory nursing journals. We will highlight the red flags of predatory journals that promote quick peer review for speedy publication that trap unsuspecting authors.</span></p>en
dc.subjectPeer Reviewen
dc.subjectPredatory Journalsen
dc.subjectPublishingen
dc.subjectNursing Literatureen
dc.date.available2017-09-28T20:46:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-28-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T20:46:18Z-
dc.conference.date2017en
dc.conference.name44th Biennial Conventionen
dc.conference.hostSigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursingen
dc.conference.locationIndianapolis, Indiana, USAen
dc.description44th Biennial Convention 2017 Theme: Influence Through Action: Advancing Global Health, Nursing, and Midwifery.en
dc.description.noteItems submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository, unless otherwise noted.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.