2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/623699
Category:
Full-text
Format:
Text-based Document
Type:
Poster
Level of Evidence:
N/A
Research Approach:
N/A
Title:
Impact of Emergency Department Sepsis Policy
Author(s):
Rayman, Lynette
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Non-member
Author Details:
Lynette Rayman, DNP, RN, CNE, CCRN-A
Abstract:

Poster presentation

Session J presented Saturday, September 16, 2017

Purpose: Sepsis and the care of sepsis patients impact the healthcare industry on a number of levels. It is a serious concern for health care providers, policy-makers, and patients due to the large number of cases, high mortality, and cost. The purposes of the project were to identify sepsis patients early during the triage process and implement Sepsis Evidence Based Order Sets within one hour of triage time. This was accomplished by the implementation of an ED sepsis policy.

Design:
This evidence-based project combined a Capstone DNP project with a quality improvment project.

Setting: The setting for this EBP project included two EDs affiliated with a not-for-profit hospital located in Northwest Indiana. One of the EDs is located within the main hospital and the other is a free-standing ED approximately 15 miles from the main hospital.

Participants/Subjects: This project compared pre-implementation (prior to policy initiation) to post-implementation (after policy initiation) data. Data were collected from electronic health records of patients utilizing the services of the two EDs and included all triaged patients > 18 years of age. . All ED staff participated in the policy implementation.

Methods: The intervention for this project was multi-faceted. The initial step was to identify and appraise the best evidence regarding ED care to potential sepsis patients. Once synthesized, the literature was integrated into an ED Sepsis policy. Education regarding the new policy was then provided to the Emergency Department staff both face to face and by a computer learning system. For this project three primary outcomes were monitored: staff compliance to the new sepsis policy, patient mortality, and patient length of stay. The primary outcomes of overall policy compliance and subcomponents of the policy were analyzed using chi-square test of independence to determine differences between the pre and post implementation groups. Patient mortality and length of stay information regarding the post implementation group were compared to organization’s first quarter data.

Results/Outcomes: A chi square test of independence was calculated comparing screening rates pre and post policy implementation. A significant interaction was found (X2(1) = 438.505, p < .001. Patients were more likely to be screened post policy implementation than pre implementation. Staff compliance with Sepsis Order Sets was also analyzed for the post implementation group and increased compliance with all components was demonstrated. Secondary outcomes of the post implementation group included a length of stay of 7.7 days and a mortality rate of 11.11% which showed a decrease from first quarter data.

Implications: Results demonstrate that implementation of a sepsis policy that includes a computer based screening tool and point of care lactate significantly impacts early identification of sepsis patients and leads to timely treatment with subsequent decreased length of stay and mortality. APNs are charged with promoting quality patient care. By synthesizing best practice evidence, implementing policy change, and monitoring and evaluating outcomes, patient care can be significantly and positively impacted.

Keywords:
Sepsis Mortality; Performance Improvement; Emergency Department
Repository Posting Date:
5-Dec-2017
Date of Publication:
5-Dec-2017
Conference Date:
2017
Conference Name:
Emergency Nursing 2017
Conference Host:
Emergency Nurses Association
Conference Location:
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Description:
ENA 2017: Education, Networking, Advocacy. Held at America's Center Convention Center, St. Louis, Missouri
Note:
Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository, unless otherwise noted.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.typePosteren
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.titleImpact of Emergency Department Sepsis Policyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRayman, Lynetteen
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen
dc.author.detailsLynette Rayman, DNP, RN, CNE, CCRN-Aen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/623699-
dc.description.abstract<p>Poster presentation</p> <p>Session J presented Saturday, September 16, 2017</p> <p>Purpose: Sepsis and the care of sepsis patients impact the healthcare industry on a number of levels. It is a serious concern for health care providers, policy-makers, and patients due to the large number of cases, high mortality, and cost. The purposes of the project were to identify sepsis patients early during the triage process and implement Sepsis Evidence Based Order Sets within one hour of triage time. This was accomplished by the implementation of an ED sepsis policy.</p> <p>Design: <br />This evidence-based project combined a Capstone DNP project with a quality improvment project.</p> <p>Setting: The setting for this EBP project included two EDs affiliated with a not-for-profit hospital located in Northwest Indiana. One of the EDs is located within the main hospital and the other is a free-standing ED approximately 15 miles from the main hospital.</p> <p>Participants/Subjects: This project compared pre-implementation (prior to policy initiation) to post-implementation (after policy initiation) data. Data were collected from electronic health records of patients utilizing the services of the two EDs and included all triaged patients &gt; 18 years of age. . All ED staff participated in the policy implementation.</p> <p>Methods: The intervention for this project was multi-faceted. The initial step was to identify and appraise the best evidence regarding ED care to potential sepsis patients. Once synthesized, the literature was integrated into an ED Sepsis policy. Education regarding the new policy was then provided to the Emergency Department staff both face to face and by a computer learning system. For this project three primary outcomes were monitored: staff compliance to the new sepsis policy, patient mortality, and patient length of stay. The primary outcomes of overall policy compliance and subcomponents of the policy were analyzed using chi-square test of independence to determine differences between the pre and post implementation groups. Patient mortality and length of stay information regarding the post implementation group were compared to organization&rsquo;s first quarter data.</p> <p>Results/Outcomes: A chi square test of independence was calculated comparing screening rates pre and post policy implementation. A significant interaction was found (X2(1) = 438.505, p &lt; .001. Patients were more likely to be screened post policy implementation than pre implementation. Staff compliance with Sepsis Order Sets was also analyzed for the post implementation group and increased compliance with all components was demonstrated. Secondary outcomes of the post implementation group included a length of stay of 7.7 days and a mortality rate of 11.11% which showed a decrease from first quarter data.</p> <p>Implications: Results demonstrate that implementation of a sepsis policy that includes a computer based screening tool and point of care lactate significantly impacts early identification of sepsis patients and leads to timely treatment with subsequent decreased length of stay and mortality. APNs are charged with promoting quality patient care. By synthesizing best practice evidence, implementing policy change, and monitoring and evaluating outcomes, patient care can be significantly and positively impacted.</p>en
dc.subjectSepsis Mortalityen
dc.subjectPerformance Improvementen
dc.subjectEmergency Departmenten
dc.date.available2017-12-05T21:30:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-05-
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-05T21:30:54Z-
dc.conference.date2017en
dc.conference.nameEmergency Nursing 2017en
dc.conference.hostEmergency Nurses Associationen
dc.conference.locationSt. Louis, Missouri, USAen
dc.descriptionENA 2017: Education, Networking, Advocacy. Held at America's Center Convention Center, St. Louis, Missourien
dc.description.noteItems submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository, unless otherwise noted.-
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.