Virginia Henderson International Nursing e-Repository
>
Independent Submissions
>
Nursing Education
>
Guidelines for Authorship Attribution and Citation in the Dissemination of Scholarly Work
12.00
- Hdl Handle:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10755/623742
- Category:
- Full-text
- Format:
- Text-based Document
- Type:
- Best Practice Guideline
- Level of Evidence:
- N/A
- Research Approach:
- N/A
- Title:
- Guidelines for Authorship Attribution and Citation in the Dissemination of Scholarly Work
- Author(s):
- Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
- Author Details:
- Chad E. O'Lynn, PhD, RN*, CNE, ANEF Director of Evaluation and Innovation; IRB Administrator colynn@chamberlain.edu 3005 Highland Parkway Downers Grove, IL 60515 *licensed in Oregon
- Abstract:
Confusion may arise when determining how to properly credit authorship of scholarly work when the work was conducted by multiple individuals. Unfortunately, there is no consensus among disciplines, journals, publication formats, and sponsors of live dissemination venues (e.g. conferences) on how authors are to be identified, listed, or cited. Without standards for author attribution and citation, teams conducting scholarly work must determine and agree to principles for appropriately acknowledging each member’s contributions at the project onset. The following discussion and recommendations may be helpful to the nursing profession by providing consistent guidelines related to publication and dissemination of scholarly work.
- Keywords:
- CINAHL Headings:
- Repository Posting Date:
- 7-Feb-2018
- Date of Publication:
- 7-Feb-2018
- Sponsors:
- Description:
- Determination of authorship roles and conventions for citation are complex and potentially controversial processes, due in large part to varying standards across disciplines and dissemination venues. Consideration of these recommendations provides consistent methods to appropriately acknowledge the contributions of co-authors, thus reducing conflicts among authors and confusion among the consumers of scholarly work.
- Note:
- This work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository.
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.type.category | Full-text | en |
dc.format | Text-based Document | en |
dc.type | Best Practice Guideline | en |
dc.evidence.level | N/A | en |
dc.research.approach | N/A | en |
dc.title | Guidelines for Authorship Attribution and Citation in the Dissemination of Scholarly Work | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | O'Lynn, Chad E. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rice, Robyn A. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Bridgers, Susan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Crouch, Suzanne J. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Phillips, Candice | en |
dc.contributor.department | Non-member | en |
dc.author.details | Chad E. O'Lynn, PhD, RN*, CNE, ANEF Director of Evaluation and Innovation; IRB Administrator colynn@chamberlain.edu 3005 Highland Parkway Downers Grove, IL 60515 *licensed in Oregon | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10755/623742 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Confusion may arise when determining how to properly credit authorship of scholarly work when the work was conducted by multiple individuals. Unfortunately, there is no consensus among disciplines, journals, publication formats, and sponsors of live dissemination venues (e.g. conferences) on how authors are to be identified, listed, or cited. Without standards for author attribution and citation, teams conducting scholarly work must determine and agree to principles for appropriately acknowledging each member’s contributions at the project onset. The following discussion and recommendations may be helpful to the nursing profession by providing consistent guidelines related to publication and dissemination of scholarly work.</p> | en |
dc.subject | Authorship | en |
dc.subject | Guidelines | en |
dc.subject | writing | en |
dc.subject | citations | en |
dc.subject | attribution | en |
dc.subject | Writing Resources | en |
dc.subject | Writing standards | en |
dc.subject.cinahl | Writing for Publication | en |
dc.subject.cinahl | Writing--Standards | en |
dc.subject.cinahl | Authorship | en |
dc.subject.cinahl | Citation Analysis | en |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-07T21:01:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02-07 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-07T21:01:55Z | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | Chamberlain University | en |
dc.description | Determination of authorship roles and conventions for citation are complex and potentially controversial processes, due in large part to varying standards across disciplines and dissemination venues. Consideration of these recommendations provides consistent methods to appropriately acknowledge the contributions of co-authors, thus reducing conflicts among authors and confusion among the consumers of scholarly work. | en |
dc.description.note | This work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository. | - |
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.