Improving Student Outcomes through Rubric Redesign

22.00
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/624004
Category:
Full-text
Format:
Text-based Document
Type:
Article
Level of Evidence:
N/A
Research Approach:
N/A
Title:
Improving Student Outcomes through Rubric Redesign
Author(s):
Raymond, Roberta; Alkrisat, Muder; Hebda, Toni
Lead Author STTI Affiliation:
Non-member
Author Details:
Roberta Raymond, PhD, RN*, CNE | Associate Professor, MSN Online Program Chamberlain University MASTER INSTRUCTOR rraymond@chamberlain.edu *Licensed in *OH, WV, IL, MN, WA, CA,AL, NY, MO, FL, GA, TN, AZ, NV, ID, SD
Abstract:

The continual need in nursing education to assess the clarity, quality and accuracy of evaluation methods in student work often leads to changes in rubric redesign for evaluation. Faculty and students faced with changes in evaluation methods may have varying levels of satisfaction with these changes. This article outlines steps taken in the development of a threaded discussion rubric.

Keywords:
Rubric; Rubrics; Education; nursing education; graduate students; Measurement; measurement methods
CINAHL Headings:
Outcomes of Education--Evaluation; Education, Nursing, Graduate; Education, Non-Traditional; Student Performance Appraisal
Repository Posting Date:
26-Mar-2018
Date of Publication:
26-Mar-2018
Sponsors:
Chamberlain University
Description:
Based on feedback from the pilot, the task force recommended implementation of the revised grading rubric for the threaded discussions. The recommendation was approved by the faculty and the curriculum committee and implemented in the September 2016 session for all courses in the MSN program.
Note:
This work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository.

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.type.categoryFull-texten
dc.formatText-based Documenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.evidence.levelN/Aen
dc.research.approachN/Aen
dc.titleImproving Student Outcomes through Rubric Redesignen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Robertaen
dc.contributor.authorAlkrisat, Muderen
dc.contributor.authorHebda, Tonien
dc.contributor.departmentNon-memberen
dc.author.detailsRoberta Raymond, PhD, RN*, CNE | Associate Professor, MSN Online Program Chamberlain University MASTER INSTRUCTOR rraymond@chamberlain.edu *Licensed in *OH, WV, IL, MN, WA, CA,AL, NY, MO, FL, GA, TN, AZ, NV, ID, SDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10755/624004-
dc.description.abstract<p>The continual need in nursing education to assess the clarity, quality and accuracy of evaluation methods in student work often leads to changes in rubric redesign for evaluation. Faculty and students faced with changes in evaluation methods may have varying levels of satisfaction with these changes. This article outlines steps taken in the development of a threaded discussion rubric.</p>en
dc.subjectRubricen
dc.subjectRubricsen
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.subjectnursing educationen
dc.subjectgraduate studentsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectmeasurement methodsen
dc.subject.cinahlOutcomes of Education--Evaluationen
dc.subject.cinahlEducation, Nursing, Graduateen
dc.subject.cinahlEducation, Non-Traditionalen
dc.subject.cinahlStudent Performance Appraisalen
dc.date.available2018-03-26T18:30:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-26-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-26T18:30:48Z-
dc.description.sponsorshipChamberlain Universityen
dc.descriptionBased on feedback from the pilot, the task force recommended implementation of the revised grading rubric for the threaded discussions. The recommendation was approved by the faculty and the curriculum committee and implemented in the September 2016 session for all courses in the MSN program.en
dc.description.noteThis work has been approved through a peer-review process prior to its posting in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository.-
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in this repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.